Full story
NY primaries reshape debate
Democratic primaries in New York became a focal point for Israel-related divisions as insurgent challengers tied opponents’ support to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, while establishment-backed incumbents struggled in marquee races.
Sen. John Fetterman told the Washington Examiner that “The people that are winning in the left districts have learned they can be more and more intensely anti-Israel, and essentially, just much of it is antisemitism,” framing the shift as a leftward turn inside deep-blue areas.
Former New York City Comptroller Brad Lander ousted Rep. Dan Goldman in New York’s 10th Congressional District, and the Washington Times said the race centered “almost entirely on the two Jewish Democrats’ divergent views on Israel’s war in Gaza.”
The Washington Times reported that Lander, who described himself as a “liberal Zionist,” hammered Goldman for accepting donations from AIPAC and for refusing to label the conflict a genocide, while the Free Press described the night as a “political earthquake” for New York City Democrats.
In the same cycle, democratic socialist Darializa Avila Chevalier defeated Rep. Adriano Espaillat in the 13th Congressional District, and the Washington Times said she attacked Espaillat for accepting “hundreds of thousands of dollars in AIPAC contributions” over his career.
Jewish leaders split on meaning
Jewish community leaders and political figures read the results as both a warning and a changing power map, with Halie Soifer of the Jewish Democratic Council of America telling JTA that “Last night’s primaries indicate that DSA, Mamdani-backed candidates can win in different areas of New York City.”
Soifer added that she “don’t think that those same candidates could win anywhere else,” and she said Jewish voters felt “very conflicted about the issue of Israel and the role that it’s now playing in Democratic politics.”
Rabbi Jonah Pesner, director of Reform Judaism’s Religious Action Center, warned that “We are deeply concerned by public leaders who vilify Jews and others who support Israel,” while House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries congratulated Lander and gave a “salute” to Goldman.
The Times of Israel also quoted Goldman after his loss, saying, “The more internal division and divisiveness, internal fighting that we have, means that they’re going to continue to push forward with their agenda.”
In parallel, the Washington Examiner reported that Democratic strategist Brad Bannon called the New York outcomes “a warning shot,” saying “Most Democrats nationally sympathize more with the Palestinians than the Israelis.”
What comes next for Democrats
Across the party, the New York results were treated as a signal for future primaries and national strategy, with the Washington Examiner quoting Democratic strategist Brad Bannon that the outcomes were “a warning shot.”
Bannon said the shift combined “the antipathy toward Israel and the big money third-party expenditures,” pointing to AIPAC-linked spending as a recurring campaign line.
The Free Press framed the change as a litmus test, saying Democratic Socialist candidates won House primaries “each backed by Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Senator Bernie Sanders,” and it described their opposition to Israel and U.S. support for the Jewish state as the unifying factor.
In the Forward, preliminary results showed Lander with about 66% of the vote to Goldman’s 34%, Avila Chevalier with 49.4% to Espaillat’s 46%, and Claire Valdez with 56% for the open seat being vacated by Rep. Nydia Velazquez.
The Forward reported that all three candidates said they will support cutting off U.S. military aid to Israel, including for the Iron Dome defense system, while Mamdani compared AIPAC to “monsters” who “move millions in dark money to accomplish a single goal.”
