
Democrats Might Save Mike Johnson’s Push to Give Trump Domestic Spying Power
Key Takeaways
- Johnson delayed the scheduled FISA extension vote due to intra-party opposition.
- The measure would renew domestic spying authorities granted to President Donald Trump.
- Democrats may step in to support the plan and reverse the delay.
Delay and potential rescue
Thanks to opposition from inside his own party, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., was forced to delay a vote on President Donald Trump’s request to extend a major domestic spying law — but Democrats could ride to the rescue.
“Thanks to opposition from inside his own party, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La”
Delay rationale and reform push
Johnson decided to delay a vote on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that had been scheduled for this week, Politico reported Friday.
The move gives critics of the law more time to push for reforms, including a requirement that federal agents get a warrant before searching for information on Americans.

Democrat positions and pressure
If the bill ultimately advances to the House floor, however, some top Democrats — including the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut — are already lobbying colleagues to vote for Trump’s request.
“Thanks to opposition from inside his own party, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La”
Others, including members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, are pushing back.
FISA 702 expiry and stakes
The internal debate among both Democrats and Republicans is a rerun of a clash two years ago over FISA — only this time, Trump’s reelection and the war on Iran have raised the stakes.
The spying law expires next month.

More on USA

Trump Delays Strikes on Iranian Energy Infrastructure Amid Talks With Iran.
43 sources compared

Senate confirms Markwayne Mullin as Homeland Security secretary
13 sources compared

Supreme Court appears poised to limit late-arriving mail-in ballots.
23 sources compared
US Senate confirms Mullin as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
24 sources compared