Expert Analysis Attributes Lamerd Strikes to US PrSM, Pentagon Denies
Image: یورونیوز

Expert Analysis Attributes Lamerd Strikes to US PrSM, Pentagon Denies

03 April, 2026.Iran.25 sources

Key Takeaways

  • CENTCOM denies Lamerd strikes and rejects media claims.
  • BBC and NYT analyses indicate a US PrSM was used in Lamerd.
  • Iranian officials claim US used a new ballistic missile in Lamerd attack.

Contested Attribution of Lamerd Strikes

Multiple weapons experts contested the US Central Command's claim that an Iranian missile was responsible.

BBC Verify, The New York Times, and Janes concluded the strikes were consistent with the US Precision Strike Missile.

Image from Anadolu Ajansı
Anadolu AjansıAnadolu Ajansı

The Pentagon denied using PrSMs, insisting the footage was consistent with an Iranian Hoveyzeh cruise missile.

This contradictory narrative pits trusted weapons analysis against official denials.

Legal and Moral Implications

Iran's Foreign Ministry condemned the Lamerd attack as a war crime, killing 21 children.

The US-Israeli campaign struck at least 600 educational facilities across Iran.

Image from Ash-Sharq lil-akhbar
Ash-Sharq lil-akhbarAsh-Sharq lil-akhbar

The IRGC claimed indisputable evidence of US involvement in both Lamerd and Minab attacks.

The Pentagon dismissed these charges as pure fabrications.

Pentagon Denials and Contradictions

Authenticated video footage features missiles accelerating toward civilian targets and exploding overhead.

Critics noted the Pentagon's denials contradicted physical evidence examined by independent experts.

The contradictory claims exemplify the fog of war and the propaganda battle.

More on Iran