
Expert Analysis Attributes Lamerd Strikes to US PrSM, Pentagon Denies
Key Takeaways
- CENTCOM denies Lamerd strikes and rejects media claims.
- BBC and NYT analyses indicate a US PrSM was used in Lamerd.
- Iranian officials claim US used a new ballistic missile in Lamerd attack.
Contested Attribution of Lamerd Strikes
Multiple weapons experts contested the US Central Command's claim that an Iranian missile was responsible.
BBC Verify, The New York Times, and Janes concluded the strikes were consistent with the US Precision Strike Missile.
The Pentagon denied using PrSMs, insisting the footage was consistent with an Iranian Hoveyzeh cruise missile.
This contradictory narrative pits trusted weapons analysis against official denials.
Legal and Moral Implications
Iran's Foreign Ministry condemned the Lamerd attack as a war crime, killing 21 children.
The US-Israeli campaign struck at least 600 educational facilities across Iran.

The IRGC claimed indisputable evidence of US involvement in both Lamerd and Minab attacks.
The Pentagon dismissed these charges as pure fabrications.
Pentagon Denials and Contradictions
CENTCOM asserted U.S. forces did not target civilians, unlike the Iranian regime.
“- Published Multiple weapons experts have disputed a US claim that Iran may have been responsible for a deadly strike on the town of Lamerd on the first day of the war”
Authenticated video footage features missiles accelerating toward civilian targets and exploding overhead.
Critics noted the Pentagon's denials contradicted physical evidence examined by independent experts.
The contradictory claims exemplify the fog of war and the propaganda battle.
More on Iran

Iran Shoots Down US F-15; One American Missing in First US Iran War Plane Loss
21 sources compared

US-Israeli Strikes Kill Over 200 Iranians Including 153 at Girls School
37 sources compared

Trump Insists Iran Talks Unhindered After US F-15 Downed
21 sources compared

Trump Threatens to Bomb Iran Back to Stone Age, Experts Warn of War Crimes
17 sources compared