Historians Sue Trump Administration to Protect Presidential Records From Destruction
Image: New York Almanack

Historians Sue Trump Administration to Protect Presidential Records From Destruction

14 April, 2026.USA.3 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Historians sue to block destruction of presidential records under the Presidential Records Act.
  • DOJ memo declares the Presidential Records Act unconstitutional and President need not comply.
  • National Archives won't commit to preserving records during litigation.

Historians Sue Trump

The lawsuit argues the memo defies binding Supreme Court precedent and represents a radical attempt to nullify a law that has governed presidential records for nearly half a century.

Image from CNN
CNNCNN

The Presidential Records Act requires presidents to preserve White House records and transfer them to the National Archives at the end of each administration.

The law was instrumental in the chain of events that led to Trump's prosecution for mishandling classified documents.

The historians warned that without court intervention, presidential records will be irretrievably lost.

National Archives Won't Commit

The historians said the National Archives will not agree to refrain from destroying records while the case is litigated.

A lawyer for the plaintiffs had reached out to the DOJ seeking assurances that records wouldn’t be destroyed, but the DOJ said it could not agree.

Image from mezha.net
mezha.netmezha.net

The plaintiffs asked the National Archives to agree it would not destroy records and would continue to make documents available for public records requests.

They also asked for assurances that White House staff will preserve documents and follow requirements for messaging apps.

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell ordered the parties to come up with a briefing schedule.

Trump's Record-Keeping

The classified documents prosecution was shut down after Trump won reelection.

Trump fired the Archivist who was in place when he returned to the White House last year.

The lawsuit raises urgent concerns about current record-keeping practices in the wake of the OLC memo.

Legal experts warn that applying the opinion could block public access to hundreds of millions of records.

More on USA