Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian Demands Gulf States Block Foreign Bases Or Face Retaliation
Image: News18

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian Demands Gulf States Block Foreign Bases Or Face Retaliation

28 March, 2026.Iran.4 sources

Pezeshkian warns Gulf neighbors not to let enemies run the war from their land. Pezeshkian says Iran won't preemptively attack but will retaliate if infrastructure or economic centers targeted.

4 outlets3 divides26 facts unevenly covered

Read them yourself

Do not take our word for it. Here is what they published.

Full story

Mediation Talks Poised

Pakistan is emerging as a focal point for regional diplomacy as tensions in West Asia rise, with foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey scheduled to meet in Pakistan on Sunday and Monday for discussions on the conflict.

Foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey are scheduled to meet in Pakistan on Sunday and Monday for discussions on the conflict.

ABP Live EnglishABP Live English

That gathering signals a potential shift in how the region addresses Washington-Israel-led moves, even as Iran stresses that Gulf states should distance themselves from bases used to wage the war.

Image from ABP Live English
ABP Live EnglishABP Live English

Masoud Pezeshkian also posted on X: 'To the countries of the region: If you want development and security, don't let our enemies run the war from your lands.'

Pezeshkian’s Direct Warning

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian’s direct messaging to Gulf neighbors is the form of a precautionary warning that anchors the broader diplomatic push.

He reiterated that Tehran does not initiate attacks but will retaliate if its infrastructure or economic centers are targeted, a line echoed across multiple outlets.

Image from Al Jazeera
Al JazeeraAl Jazeera

The message also places responsibility on regional states not to allow foreign bases to be used for operations against Iran, framing the issue as one of domestic development and security.

Demands and Leverage in Gulf

The emerging agenda around West Asia diplomacy rests on a set of explicit demands that participants in the regional diplomacy hope to constrain.

as the United States uses military bases in Gulf countries to launch attacks on Iran

ABP Live EnglishABP Live English

Western bases and operations in Gulf states are framed as the leverage point—Tehran warns against using Gulf bases to wage war, while Tehran says it will retaliate if attacked—making the 'don’t let our enemies run the war from your lands' message a call to distance from U.S. and Israeli military lines of operation.

Several outlets note the underlying dynamic: the United States uses Gulf bases to launch attacks on Iran, which compounds the calls for regional insulation from external militaries.

Escalation Risks in Gulf

The security calculus is expanding into tangible regional incidents, amplifying the risk that diplomatic maneuvering could collide with escalating military activity.

Al Jazeera reports new Gulf attacks, including drones striking Kuwait’s airport and incidents near Oman’s Salalah port, underscoring how quickly bases and supply chains could become flashpoints if the region’s states drift toward a broader confrontation.

Image from ABP Live English
ABP Live EnglishABP Live English

The episodes illustrate why regional leaders may feel compelled to seek de-escalation channels even as they navigate competing security alignments.

Context and Framing

Taken together, the reporting points to a moment when diplomacy—centered in Pakistan—tries to outpace a widening war narrative in West Asia.

"The war began when the US and Israel launched air strikes across Iran on February 28, killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and sending shockwaves across the globe."

Al JazeeraAl Jazeera

Al Jazeera frames the opening volley of the conflict as US-Israeli strikes that rippled through the region, while News18 and NDTV Profit flag the need for trust and mediated talks as essential to prevent a broader spillover.

Image from Al Jazeera
Al JazeeraAl Jazeera

The framing across outlets consistently emphasizes asymmetry: Tehran argues it retaliates, while Gulf states feel the pressure of expanding security stakes and external military footprints, shaping a complex backdrop for any forthcoming negotiations.