Judge Disqualifies Trio in Trump Administration’s Illegal Power Grab Over New Jersey U.S. Attorneys
Image: Los Angeles Daily News

Judge Disqualifies Trio in Trump Administration’s Illegal Power Grab Over New Jersey U.S. Attorneys

10 March, 2026.USA.3 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Judge disqualified three Justice Department officials from overseeing New Jersey federal prosecutions.
  • Judge ruled the appointments violated the Constitution as an unlawful Trump administration power grab.
  • Ruling is a scathing 130-page opinion deepening the judiciary's conflict with President Donald Trump.

Judge disqualifies DOJ officials

A federal judge in Trenton, New Jersey barred three Justice Department officials from overseeing federal prosecutions in the state.

Judge disqualifies trio of lawyers tapped to lead New Jersey’s federal prosecutor’s office TRENTON, N

Associated PressAssociated Press

In a scathing 130-page ruling, the judge concluded their appointments were made as part of an illegal power grab by the Trump administration and disqualified the trio from supervising prosecutions there.

Image from Associated Press
Associated PressAssociated Press

Brann ruling on appointments

U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann detailed his findings in a 130-page opinion, naming the three lawyers involved.

He explained that the arrangement—a 'triumvirate' splitting criminal, civil and administrative duties—exceeded the Attorney General’s statutory authority and violated the Constitution’s Appointments Clause.

Image from Gothamist
GothamistGothamist

Brann concluded the structure amounted to an improper unilateral appointment that bypassed the required presidential nomination and Senate confirmation process.

Appointments tied to Habba resignation

The opinion identifies the three officials as Philip Lamparello, Jordan Fox and Ari Fontecchio.

It ties their appointments directly to the resignation of acting U.S. Attorney Alina Habba.

Gothamist notes Habba had resigned after an appeals court held she had been serving unlawfully.

The judge’s ruling frames these moves as part of a pattern of the administration filling top federal prosecutor posts outside the usual confirmation process.

Dispute over U.S. attorneys

News coverage frames the ruling as the latest chapter in a broader, long-running dispute between the judiciary and President Trump over the proper process for appointing U.S. attorneys.

Multiple outlets emphasize that U.S. attorneys normally require presidential nomination and Senate confirmation, and that this case highlights legal limits on how the Justice Department and Attorney General may reassign or delegate those roles.

Image from Associated Press
Associated PressAssociated Press

Court ruling on prosecutors

The ruling disqualifies Lamparello, Fox and Fontecchio from overseeing federal prosecutions in New Jersey and reinforces judicial oversight over appointment processes.

The Trump administration’s plan to have three lawyers jointly run the U

GothamistGothamist

Outlets report the immediate effect as barring these officials from supervising prosecutions while underscoring the constitutional questions raised by the administration’s short-term fixes.

Image from Gothamist
GothamistGothamist

More on USA