Justin Sun Sues World Liberty Financial in California Over Frozen WLFI Tokens and Voting Rights

Tron founder Justin Sun has sued World Liberty Financial in a California federal court over what he describes as unlawfully frozen WLFI tokens and threats tied to his holdings.

Multiple outlets describe the dispute as centered on Sun’s “frozen assets” and his “reserved voting rights,” with Sun alleging World Liberty “unlawfully locked up his $WLFI tokens” and “defrauded him about their rights and value.”

@coindesk

CoinDesk reports that Sun’s lawsuit alleges World Liberty “unfairly froze Sun's $WLFI tokens and threatened him,” and it says the suit claims World Liberty “made fraudulent misrepresentations” and “threatened and defamed Sun.”

CoinGape similarly frames the case as a fight over “ownership of his frozen WLFI tokens and voting rights in the ecosystem,” and it quotes Sun’s X statement: “Today, I filed a lawsuit in California federal court against World Liberty Financial to protect my legal rights as a holder of $WLFI tokens.”

Blockonomi adds that Sun alleges the World Liberty Financial team “improperly locked his token holdings, eliminated his governance voting capabilities, and issued threats to permanently destroy his investment without providing adequate justification.”

In Mediaite’s account, Sun filed the lawsuit alleging his “multi-million dollar investment was procured through fraud” and that the project is now “on the verge of collapse.”

Across the coverage, World Liberty Financial’s response is consistent in tone: CoinDesk says “A spokesperson for World Liberty Financial said they had no comment on the lawsuit,” while Crypto Briefing says WLFI posted “See you in court pal.”

Sun’s complaint, as described by CoinDesk and Mediaite, ties the frozen-token dispute to his 2024 investment and to later changes in how World Liberty handled token control.

CoinDesk says Sun “invested $45 million in $WLFI in 2024” based partly on “the Trump family’s association with the project,” and it quotes the suit’s framing of that timing: “At that pivotal time for World Liberty, Mr. Sun invested $45 million to purchase $WLFI tokens from World Liberty.”

@coindesk

CoinDesk also says World Liberty asked Sun to keep investing through 2025, including a request to mint World Liberty’s “USD1 stablecoin,” and it reports the filing’s claim that “By July 2025, when it became clear that Mr. Sun would not invest or mint USD1 on their terms, World Liberty principals became hostile toward Mr. Sun.”

Mediaite adds that Sun’s complaint says he “lawfully purchased” “cryptographically secured digital $WLFI tokens,” and it quotes Sun’s description of his own status as “the founder of the TRON blockchain network whose native digital TRX tokens currently have a market capitalization of over $31 billion.”

In the same Mediaite account, Sun’s complaint alleges WLF used the project “as a golden opportunity to leverage the Trump brand to profit through fraud,” and it says the complaint accuses WLF’s “operators” of “threaten[ing] to burn Mr. Sun’s tokens” and “report him to law enforcement.”

CoinDesk provides more detail on the threats, saying the suit alleges “World Liberty made two overt threats” and naming Chase Herro as the person who allegedly threatened to burn Sun’s tokens if Sun did not ask for them to be burned.

CoinDesk further reports that Sun alleges Herro “falsely claimed that the know-your-customer ('KYC') documentation submitted by Mr. Sun and the Sun Companies in connection with their $WLFI token purchases was inadequate,” and that Herro threatened to report Sun to U.S. authorities.

A central allegation in the lawsuit, as described by CoinDesk and Crypto Briefing, is that World Liberty added a “blacklisting” function that allowed freezing tokens in specific wallets.

CoinDesk says that “World Liberty changed the smart contract governing $WLFI in August 2025 to add a “blacklisting” function that allowed the company to freeze tokens in specific wallets,” and it adds that Sun alleges the modification “was not put to a governance vote or disclosed to investors.”

CoinDesk quotes the complaint’s language that “In the dark of night, the company thus created a 'blacklisting' function that it could wield at will.”

Crypto Briefing similarly describes Sun’s earlier public accusations, saying that in a statement on April 12 he accused World Liberty of using a concealed blacklist function in its smart contract that “can freeze or restrict token holders’ assets without notice.”

Crypto Briefing also reports that the dispute “started in September 2025, when the Trump-backed project blacklisted his WLFI wallet and froze roughly 540 million unlocked tokens,” and it links that move to “on-chain transfers of around $9 million worth of WLFI to exchanges.”

CoinDesk’s account of the freezing mechanism is tied to Sun’s claim that World Liberty centralized control over tokens despite presenting itself as decentralized finance, and it says Sun alleges the company “had centralized control over its tokens.”

CoinDesk also reports that Sun alleges the freezing served “a dual purpose,” including pressuring him to mint “$200 million” of USD1 stablecoin on his Tron blockchain and manipulating WLFI’s market price by preventing one of the largest holders from selling.

The lawsuit and the surrounding dispute also revolve around a governance proposal dated April 15 and the terms Sun says would lock tokens and require token destruction for some participants.

CoinDesk reports that World Liberty asked Sun to continue investing through 2025 and to mint USD1, and it also describes Sun’s allegations that token holders had approved a proposal to make “a portion of the supply tradable” while World Liberty allegedly added blacklisting without disclosure.

Blockonomi

CoinGape focuses on Sun’s opposition to the “April 15 lock-up proposal,” saying Sun “strongly opposes the team's April 15 lock-up proposal” and that the proposal includes “permanent lockups on non-acceptors of the proposal.”

CoinGape adds that the proposal asks to “burn 10%,” and it says that “if refused will lead to permanent burns,” while also describing “a two-year cliff followed by a two-year vesting schedule” for early investors like Sun.

Blockonomi describes the same governance resolution as proposing converting “more than 62 billion WLFI tokens from unlimited lockup periods into predetermined vesting timelines,” and it says the resolution establishes that “a two-year token freeze, followed by incremental distribution across three additional years” would apply to founders, development personnel, and advisors.

Blockonomi also states that “a 10% token destruction would occur upon proposal approval,” and it says investors declining to accept the revised conditions would see holdings “locked permanently under the current framework.”

Live Bitcoin News similarly says Sun was “vehemently opposed to the proposal that was announced on April 15,” and it repeats the structure: “advisor token burn of 10%,” “a 2-year cliff and 2-year vesting.”

Beyond the token mechanics, the dispute is repeatedly framed through World Liberty Financial’s links to Donald Trump and his family, and through broader claims about fraud, regulatory exposure, and financial instability.

Mediaite says World Liberty Financial’s management includes “Trump’s sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, and Zach Witkoff,” and it adds that the president is listed as the company’s “chief crypto advocate” while “Barron Trump” is named the “DeFi (decentralized finance) visionary.”

Blockonomi

Mediaite also reports that Sun’s complaint says he “has long been (and remains) an ardent supporter of President Trump and the Trump family,” and it quotes Sun’s explanation for investing: “not only because of the project’s claims that it would promote adoption of decentralized finance—an issue Mr. Sun cares deeply about and to which he has devoted much of his life’s work—but also because of the Trump family’s association with the project.”

CoinDesk adds that Sun’s lawsuit alleges World Liberty is “a Trump family–backed crypto and stablecoin project,” and it says the filing argues World Liberty’s powers “may not just undercut its decentralization claims, but also raise regulatory questions,” including that those powers “could qualify the firm as a money transmitter under the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network's rules.”

Mediaite’s account goes further in stakes, saying Sun alleges the project is “on the verge of collapse,” and it also describes prior legal and regulatory attention around Sun, including that the U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network had flagged Tron for “growing in popularity among illicit actors.”

On the other side, Crypto Briefing reports WLFI’s social-media response that Sun is “playing the victim,” and it quotes WLFI’s April 12 post: “Does anyone still believe @justinsuntron ?” and “See…”.

Live Bitcoin News adds that WLFI “refuted all the allegations” and said Sun’s wallet was frozen due to “suspected misconduct,” while also claiming it freezes to “block dangerous or unlawful activity.”