No accountability: Bills would ban liability lawsuits for climate change
Image: Ars Technica

No accountability: Bills would ban liability lawsuits for climate change

16 March, 2026.USA.1 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Bills would shield polluters from climate accountability and ban liability for harms.
  • Harms and associated costs from climate change continue to mount.
  • Efforts form part of a broader counter-offensive across Congress, White House, courts.

Push for climate liability shield

Republican lawmakers in multiple states and Congress are advancing proposals to shield polluters from climate accountability and prevent any type of liability for climate change harms—even as these harms and their associated costs continue to mount.

Republican lawmakers in multiple states and Congress are advancing proposals to shield polluters from climate accountability and prevent any type of liability for climate change harms—even as these harms and their associated costs continue to mount

Ars TechnicaArs Technica

It’s the latest in a counter-offensive that has unfolded on multiple fronts, from the halls of Congress and the White House to courts and state attorneys general offices across the country.

Image from Ars Technica
Ars TechnicaArs Technica

Dozens of local communities, states, and individuals are suing major oil and gas companies and their trade associations over rising climate costs and for allegedly lying to consumers about climate change risks and solutions.

At the same time, some states are enacting or considering laws modeled after the federal Superfund program that would impose retroactive liability on large fossil fuel producers and levy a one-time charge on them to help fund climate adaptation and resiliency measures.

Supreme Court climate case

Last month the court decided to take up a petition lodged by oil companies Suncor and ExxonMobil in a climate-damages case brought against the companies by Boulder, Colorado.

The petition argues that Boulder’s claims are barred by federal law, and if the justices agree, it could knock out not only Boulder’s lawsuit but also many others like it.

Image from Ars Technica
Ars TechnicaArs Technica

The court is expected to hear the case during its upcoming term that starts in October.

Retroactive liability via Superfund model

Some states are enacting or considering laws modeled after the federal Superfund program that would impose retroactive liability on large fossil fuel producers and levy a one-time charge on them to help fund climate adaptation and resiliency measures.

Republican lawmakers in multiple states and Congress are advancing proposals to shield polluters from climate accountability and prevent any type of liability for climate change harms—even as these harms and their associated costs continue to mount

Ars TechnicaArs Technica

Congressional action on immunity

There is also a possibility that Republicans in Congress will take action before then to gift the fossil fuel industry legal immunity, similar to that granted to gun manufacturers with the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.

Sixteen Republican attorneys general wrote to US Attorney General Pam Bondi in June suggesting that the Department of Justice could recommend legislation creating precisely this type of liability shield.

Image from Ars Technica
Ars TechnicaArs Technica

And last month, one Republican congresswoman announced that such legislation is indeed in the works.

More on USA