Donald Trump Jabs Prince Harry Over Ukraine Remarks, Tells Him ‘Give Meghan My Regards’

Prince Harry’s surprise appearance in Kyiv on Thursday, April 23, 2026, at the Kyiv Security Forum triggered an immediate response from U.S. President Donald Trump when Trump was asked about the remarks later that day.

In Kyiv, Harry urged “American leadership to step up” in Russia’s ongoing attacks on Ukraine, while the People account says he did so “without naming Trump directly.”

BBC

Harry framed the U.S. role in the conflict by saying, “The United States has a singular role in this story,” and he added that “when Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons, America was part of the assurance that Ukraine’s sovereignty and borders would be respected.”

The Independent similarly reports that Harry urged the U.S. to “honour its international treaty obligations” and described the speech as an impassioned call for “American leadership.”

When reporters asked Trump about Harry’s comments, Trump responded with a personal jab about Meghan Markle, saying, “How’s his wife? Please give her my regards,” and then added, “I know one thing: Prince Harry is not speaking for the U.K.”

Sky News also described the exchange as Trump hitting out at Harry over Ukraine war remarks, noting the question came after Harry urged the U.S. to honour its “obligations” in the Ukraine conflict.

The BBC reported that Trump said, “I think I am speaking for the U.K. more than Prince Harry,” and that he “appreciates Prince Harry’s advice very much.”

Multiple outlets describe Harry’s Kyiv remarks as both a call for U.S. action and a direct moral framing of the war’s human cost.

The Independent says Harry clarified he was “not here as a politician” but as “a soldier who understands service” and a “humanitarian,” while People reports Harry said, “The United States has a singular role in this story.”

BBC

In the Kyiv Independent account, Harry urged Washington to act more decisively and called it “a moment for American leadership,” while also urging the U.S. to demonstrate it can “honor its international treaty obligations, not out of charity, but out of its own enduring role in global security and strategic stability.”

The Times adds further detail from Harry’s speech, including his warning that the world must not “grow used to this war or numb to its consequences,” and it quotes Harry saying, “Because what is happening here is not simply a war about territory. It is a war about values.”

The Times also reports that Harry said there was “mounting, documented evidence of systematic war crimes,” including “the forcible transfer of children,” which he said could amount to “an act of genocide.”

The Kyiv Independent likewise reports that Harry called on Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the war, quoting him: “There is still a moment — now — to stop this war, to prevent further suffering for Ukrainians and Russians alike, and to choose a different course.”

Across the coverage, the speech is consistently tied to Harry’s insistence that the U.S. role is decisive, with the Guardian describing it as a “lengthy, impassioned speech” at the Kyiv Security Forum during a surprise visit to show support for Ukraine after four years of war with Russia.

Trump’s response combined personal remarks with a political insistence that Harry lacked authority to speak for the U.K.

“- Published Donald Trump has said the Duke of Sussex was "not speaking for the UK" when he called for the US to show "leadership" on Ukraine - comments which came days before King Charles was due to meet the president”

BBC

People reports that when Trump was asked about Harry’s remarks, Trump initially deflected with a reference to Meghan Markle, saying, “Prince Harry? How's he doing? How's his wife? Please give her my regards.”

People then quotes Trump’s broader point that “Prince Harry is not speaking for the U.K. That's for sure,” and it adds Trump’s claim that “I think I'm speaking for the U.K. more than Prince Harry.”

The Independent presents the same exchange in a similar sequence, quoting Trump: “I know one thing, Prince Harry is not speaking for the UK, that’s for sure. I think I am speaking for the UK more than Prince Harry.”

The BBC likewise reports Trump said, “Prince Harry? How's he doing? How's his wife? Please give her my regards,” before adding, “I know one thing, Prince Harry is not speaking for the UK, that's for sure.”

In the Guardian’s account, Trump’s line is framed as a direct response to Harry’s speech, quoting Trump: “I think I am speaking for the UK more than Prince Harry… but I appreciate his advice very much.”

Beyond the barbs, the BBC says Trump did not answer directly when asked if he would invite Harry to dinner during the state visit of King Charles III and Queen Camilla, and it quotes Trump saying, “He's a friend of mine. We're really looking forward to it. We've spoken and we're going to have a great time.”

The Trump-Harry clash is repeatedly placed in the immediate lead-up to King Charles III’s U.S. visit, with outlets describing the timing as days before the monarch meets the president.

People says the remarks came “Ahead of King Charles's state visit next week,” and it describes the King and Queen Camilla touching down in Washington, D.C., on Monday, April 27, for a four-day visit tied to the 250th anniversary of U.S. independence from the United Kingdom.

Chester Standard

The Independent similarly says the King and Queen are due to travel to the U.S. on Monday for a four-day visit during which they will meet Trump, and it notes the trip includes appearances in D.C., New York City and Virginia.

The Kyiv Independent states that Harry’s Kyiv trip comes days before his father, King Charles III, is scheduled to travel to the United States for a state visit from April 27 to 30.

The BBC adds that the King and Queen are due to meet Trump at the White House during their four-day visit to the U.S., which “starts on Monday,” and it describes the trip as coming “during a tense period in US-UK relations.”

In the BBC’s account, Trump previously said he was “not happy” with the U.K. government’s decision not to join offensive operations in the Iran war, and it says Trump has repeatedly criticised Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, including describing him as “not Winston Churchill” in March.

Against that backdrop, the exchange over who speaks for the U.K. becomes part of the diplomatic atmosphere surrounding the state visit, with the Closer outlet describing it as a “symbolic legitimacy duel” that could surface “at every microphone placed in front of Charles III in Washington.”

While all the outlets describe the same core exchange—Harry’s Kyiv Security Forum remarks and Trump’s response—coverage diverges in what each outlet emphasizes and how it frames the significance.

People foregrounds the personal insult, centering Trump’s line “How's his wife? Please give her my regards” and adding that Trump said Harry “doesn't speak for the U.K.”

Closer

The Independent focuses on Trump’s dismissal of Harry’s authority, quoting Trump’s insistence that “Prince Harry ‘is not speaking for the UK’,” and it highlights Harry’s self-description as “not here as a politician” but as “a soldier who understands service” and “a humanitarian.”

The BBC emphasizes Trump’s refusal to directly answer a question about inviting Harry to dinner, reporting that “The US president did not answer directly when asked if he would invite Harry to dinner,” and it includes Trump’s comments about the King as “a ‘fantastic man’.”

Sky News frames the story as a video moment, describing it as “‘How's his wife?': Watch Trump hit out at Harry over Ukraine war remarks,” and it specifies that Trump was asked after Harry urged the U.S. to honour its “obligations.”

The Guardian similarly centers Trump’s claim to speak for the U.K., quoting Trump: “I think I am speaking for the UK more than Prince Harry… but I appreciate his advice very much,” and it describes the speech as a “lengthy, impassioned” one during a surprise visit.

Finally, Closer uses a meta framing about legitimacy, describing the exchange as a “symbolic legitimacy duel” and asserting that it risks surfacing “at every microphone placed in front of Charles III in Washington.”

The immediate next steps in the coverage are anchored to the state visit schedule and to the question of whether the U.S.-U.K. relationship can be “mend[ed]” despite the public flare-up.

People says King Charles and Queen Camilla’s four-day visit begins after they “touch down in Washington, D.C., on Monday, April 27,” and it states the visit is “tied to the 250th anniversary of U.S. independence from the United Kingdom.”

People also reports that during the visit, King Charles will follow in the footsteps of the late Queen Elizabeth and become “just the second-ever British monarch to deliver an address to a joint meeting of Congress,” noting Elizabeth delivered a speech at the Capitol in 1991.

The Independent adds that the President has said the visit could “absolutely” mend relations with the UK damaged over the Iran war, and it places the exchange over Ukraine in a broader context of tensions with the U.K. government.

The BBC similarly says the trip comes during a “tense period in US-UK relations,” particularly on British involvement in the Iran war, and it notes Trump’s prior criticism of the U.K. decision not to join offensive operations.

The Kyiv Independent provides the date range for the state visit as April 27 to 30, reinforcing the tight timeline between Harry’s April 23 speech and the start of the royal trip.

Across outlets, the stakes are framed through the question of leadership on Ukraine and the public contest over who speaks for the U.K., with the Guardian and BBC both centering Trump’s insistence that Harry “is not speaking for the UK.”