Europe26 May, 20263 min read
Recycling Could Meet Half of Europe’s Critical Mineral Needs by 2050
This article is an automated aggregation of coverage from news outlets. Our editorials offer in-depth analysis curated by the NewsCord team.
Recycling could meet about half Europe’s critical mineral demand by 2050. Current CRM recovery is low; urban mine remains underutilized.
Europe’s “urban mine”
Europe’s energy and digital transition depends on critical raw materials, including “rare earth elements, REE,” which the Italian Climate Network describes as “17 elementi” used across industrial sectors from energy to electronics. The same source warns that extracting and processing these minerals involves “processi complessi” that can create “gravi impatti ambientali,” and it cites a calculation that processing one ton of rare-earth metals produces “circa 2.000 tonnellate di rifiuti tossici.” A separate EU-funded effort, the FutuRaM project, mapped Europe’s “urban mine” and found that in 2022 European products containing critical raw materials sent roughly “5.2 million tonnes” of those materials through factory gates into homes, vehicles, wind farms, and data centres.
FutuRaM researchers reported that about “2.1 million tonnes” eventually turned up in the waste stream, while a little under “1.4 million tonnes” was recovered, leaving the remainder to be lost through landfill, informal recycling, or exports for processing outside the EU. The Mirage News write-up of the same assessment says the mapping covered the EU27+4—“EU, UK, Switzerland, Iceland, and Norway”—and analyzed “42 critical elements” across waste streams including electronic waste, vehicles and their batteries, and wind turbines.
Recovery targets and gaps
The ScienceBlog account of FutuRaM says Europe is “still quite poor at getting the metals back out once those things stop working,” even as it notes that five critical materials already achieve recovery rates above “80 percent.” It adds that “22 others” yield “less than a single tonne per year across the entire European Union and four associated countries,” with most rare earth elements in that category. Looking ahead to 2050, the ScienceBlog text projects lithium recovery could rise from “well under a thousand tonnes annually” to “somewhere between 30,000 and 52,000 tonnes,” and cobalt from “roughly a thousand tonnes to as much as 40,000.”
Mirage News frames the same FutuRaM results as a range of annual recovery potential by 2050, saying recovery systems could enable Europe to recover between “4.1 and 5.7 million tonnes of CRMs annually.” In the same Mirage News summary, the “business-as-usual conditions” scenario is tied to “up to 33%” primary substitution, while an improved-recovery scenario reaches “up to 47%” and a circular-economy scenario reaches “56%.”
Policy, supply security, and nature
Yonhap reports that South Korea and the European Union agreed to push for deeper cooperation in “critical minerals, supply chains and other economic security issues,” with the meeting jointly led by Vice Trade Minister Park Jung-sung and EU counterpart Denis Redonnet. In the critical minerals sector, Yonhap says the two sides agreed to “push for stronger cooperation in supply chain diversification as well as the stockpiling and recycling of critical minerals,” reflecting high import dependence on such materials. Climate Home News quotes Kees Baldé, a senior researcher at UNITAR, saying harnessing Europe’s waste-stream potential would be “essential for strengthening supply security, supporting the clean-energy transition, and reducing environmental impacts.”
But Le Soir and 24 Heures both stress that the energy transition’s reliance on “lithium, cobalt, nickel” and rare earths in wind turbine magnets can still carry ecological and social consequences, warning of “ecological disasters” and “land dispossession.” 24 Heures adds that Greenpeace asked the University of Sydney to analyze mineral needs under scenarios aligned with limiting warming to “1.5°C,” and it says one scenario foresees a “23% reduction” in overall demand for critical minerals compared with the baseline scenario.