Rwanda-Backed M23 Rebels Remain in Uvira After Announcing Withdrawal

M23 rebels announced they would withdraw from the eastern Congolese city of Uvira.

“Exclusive Al Jazeera footage shows fighters, military vehicles on the move as M23 spokespeople say withdrawal under way”

Al Jazeera

Residents, local officials and outside observers report that fighters remain in the town.

Al Jazeera

TRT Afrika reports residents told Reuters that M23 rebels have not withdrawn from Uvira despite announcing earlier in the week that they would.

M23’s spokesman Willy Ngoma said the rebels are ready to leave but want their conditions reviewed and want Uvira protected by a neutral force.

NewsCentralTV notes that U.S. officials said they had seen no credible evidence of a withdrawal.

Arab News PK cites Kinshasa calling the announcement a distraction and saying fighters remained in the city.

These competing claims leave the on-the-ground situation contested.

International actors and mediators are central to how the withdrawal announcement is being framed.

Sources report that M23 presented the planned pullback as a gesture to U.S. and Qatari mediation.

Arab News PK

U.S. officials say they have not observed an actual withdrawal and have pressed Rwanda over its alleged support for the rebels.

TRT Afrika reports the pullback was framed to aid mediation led by the US and Qatar.

Newscentraltv cites U.S. statements that they have 'seen no credible evidence' of withdrawal and notes U.S. warnings about violations of the Washington Accords.

Arab News PK records that U.S. officials have accused Rwanda of violating the peace deal and warned of consequences.

The Globe and Mail snippet in the file is not informative on this point, limiting what that outlet adds.

Kinshasa has strongly rejected M23's announcement and publicly accused Rwanda of backing the militia.

“The United States cast doubt Wednesday on a claim by the Rwanda-backed M23 armed group that it was withdrawing fromUvirain the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo as requested by Washington”

newscentraltv

TRT Afrika reports Kinshasa dismissed the withdrawal announcement as a 'diversion', arguing it was meant to ease pressure on Rwanda.

Arab News PK quotes DRC spokesman Patrick Muyaya calling the claim a diversion and demanding Rwandan troops leave.

NewsCentralTV notes the U.S. has implicated Kigali in backing M23 and warned of responses to alleged violations of the Washington Accords.

Those public accusations are central to the political standoff and shape how the withdrawal claim is received.

Observers warn the Uvira episode has deep humanitarian and regional implications.

Arab News PK notes at least 85,000 people have fled into Burundi since the Uvira advance.

The Globe and Mail

NewsCentralTV frames the Dec. 10 capture of Uvira as raising fears of a wider regional war and points to eastern DRC's resource wealth and long-running violence since M23's resurgence.

TRT Afrika highlights Uvira's strategic position near the Burundi border and the group's insistence on a neutral protecting force should they withdraw.

Taken together, the sources underline displacement, regional danger and the risks to the Washington Accords if accusations of cross-border support persist.

Coverage across sources presents a contested narrative about M23's actions.

“M23 rebels have not withdrawn from the eastern Congolese town of Uvira despite an announcement earlier this week that they would pull back, residents told Reuters on Wednesday”

TRT Afrika

M23 says it will pull back under conditions and mediation.

TRT Afrika

Residents and Kinshasa say fighters remain and dismiss M23's announcement as diversionary.

The U.S. has said it has seen no reliable evidence of withdrawal and is pressuring Rwanda over alleged backing of the group.

TRT Afrika reports M23’s conditional readiness to leave and Kinshasa’s rejection.

newscentraltv stresses U.S. skepticism and diplomatic pressure while Arab News PK highlights displacement and Kinshasa’s forceful denunciation.

The Globe and Mail entry in the bundle is incomplete and offers no independent corroboration.

Because sources contradict who holds Uvira and whether a withdrawal is underway, the situation remains ambiguous and disputed.