Senate Passes Housing Bill Threatening to Shut Down Build-to-Rent Industry

The Senate advanced a broad bipartisan housing package called the Road to Housing Act that contains dozens of measures aimed at increasing housing supply, but senators added a controversial section that would sharply restrict build-to-rent (BTR) development by requiring institutional developers to sell new homes to individuals within seven years.

“Senate Passes Housing Bill That Threatens To 'Shut Down' Build-To-Rent Industry The Senate passed its version of a historic housing reform bill Thursday, but it added new rules for developers of build-to-rent single-family homes that drew sharp backlash from the previously supportive real estate industry”

Bisnow

Bisnow reports the bill "includes dozens of new policies aimed at increasing the supply of housing — such as simplifying the environmental review process — but it also includes new restrictions on developers of build-to-rent communities that have been widely criticized as stifling housing construction," and that "the provision would require institutional developers of BTR housing to sell new homes to individuals within seven years."

Bisnow

The Senate’s language defines an institutional investor for this purpose as an entity owning 350 or more homes, a threshold that shapes which firms would be affected.

Industry groups and housing advocates warned the BTR provisions could shut down a major development model and undermine the bill’s other pro-supply measures.

The Mortgage Bankers Association and 11 other groups told senators that "The 7-year disposition requirement will effectively shut down BTR development, leading to less supply and fewer options for renters," and argued the rule "threatens to negate the other pro-supply elements of the larger bipartisan housing package."

Bisnow

The National Multifamily Housing Council and National Apartment Association similarly called the addition "harmful" and urged changes after the Senate vote, while coalitions of industry organizations and YIMBY-affiliated groups sent letters pleading for the seven-year sale provision to be cut.

The provision has split lawmakers and exposed political trade-offs: Sen. Brian Schatz voted against the bill, saying the BTR rule would "essentially ban a specific kind of housing" and speculated it could be a drafting error fixable by a two-line change, while Sen. Elizabeth Warren defended the measure as an intentional effort "to block private equity from taking over the single family home."

“Senate Passes Housing Bill That Threatens To 'Shut Down' Build-To-Rent Industry The Senate passed its version of a historic housing reform bill Thursday, but it added new rules for developers of build-to-rent single-family homes that drew sharp backlash from the previously supportive real estate industry”

Bisnow

The roll call showed Schatz "was the only Democrat to vote against the bill," and Republicans including Ted Cruz, Rick Scott, Rand Paul and Thom Tillis also opposed it; meanwhile, House Freedom Caucus members indicated they would not support the Senate version, likening parts of it to socialism.

The bill’s future depends on House action and possible corrections: the House must either pass the Senate’s version or convene a conference to reconcile differences before sending the measure to the president.

Bisnow notes that the House had passed its own version earlier without the single-family restrictions, and the White House and the Trump administration have both signaled interest in curbing institutional investors — including through an executive order and State of the Union references — even as the president has been described as ambivalent by some reports.

Bisnow

Opponents warned of immediate supply impacts and possible forced displacement if the BTR pathway is closed, and multiple industry letters called on senators to remove the seven-year requirement before the bill becomes law.