Trump administration sues Harvard for failing to protect Jewish and Israeli students

The Trump administration filed a lawsuit against Harvard University on March 20, 2026, alleging the prestigious institution violated federal civil rights law by failing to protect Jewish and Israeli students from harassment and discrimination.

“They claim the university has shown 'deliberate indifference' to hostility towards these students”

ABP Live

The 44-page complaint, filed in Massachusetts federal court, accuses Harvard of remaining 'deliberately indifferent' to antisemitic conduct on campus since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel.

ABP Live

The Justice Department claims Harvard intentionally refused to enforce its campus rules when victims were Jewish or Israeli students, creating a hostile educational environment that denied these students equal access to educational opportunities.

The lawsuit seeks both injunctive relief and the recovery of billions of dollars in federal grants that Harvard received while allegedly in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on race or national origin in federally funded programs.

According to the Justice Department complaint, Jewish and Israeli students at Harvard have been subjected to 'severe, pervasive and objectively offensive harassment' since October 2023, including physical assault, stalking, being spat upon, and being denied access to educational facilities.

The lawsuit specifically mentions that some students wore baseball caps to conceal their yarmulkes out of fear for their safety.

Arise News

The administration claims Harvard's response was 'do nothing' and that the university's faculty and leadership 'turned a blind eye to antisemitism and discrimination against Jews and Israelis.'

Harvard forcefully rejected these allegations in statements from its spokesperson, calling the lawsuit 'pretextual and retaliatory' and insisting that the university 'cares deeply about members of our Jewish and Israeli community' and has taken 'substantive, proactive steps to address the root causes of antisemitism.'

The university pointed to its expanded training programs, improved disciplinary processes, and adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism as evidence of its commitment to addressing the issue.

The lawsuit represents the latest escalation in a year-long conflict between the federal government and Harvard, which has included multiple legal battles and aggressive administrative actions.

“The process typically took months or years”

Associated Press

Since taking office, the Trump administration has frozen more than $2.2 billion in federal research grants to Harvard, attempted to strip the university of its tax-exempt status, moved to bar most international students from studying at the institution, and severed academic ties with the Defense Department.

Harvard fought back in court, winning a significant victory in September 2025 when a federal judge ruled that the administration's funding freeze violated Harvard's First Amendment rights and federal law, calling the antisemitism argument a 'smokescreen.'

The government filed an appeal in December 2025, which remains ongoing.

The Justice Department also filed a separate lawsuit in February 2026 alleging Harvard failed to cooperate with investigations into whether it discriminates against white applicants in its admissions process, and Harvard has countersued the administration over these actions.

The financial stakes involved in this legal battle are substantial, with Harvard currently set to receive more than $2.6 billion in grants from the Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies.

The lawsuit asks the court to declare that Harvard breached its contracts and assurances of compliance under Title VI, which would allow the government to stop paying existing grants and demand restitution for payments made during the alleged period of noncompliance.

CBS News

The administration has also requested the appointment of an independent monitor approved by the government to oversee Harvard's compliance with any court order.

Negotiations between Harvard and the Trump administration have been fraught with tension, with reports indicating that the two sides were close to reaching agreements on multiple occasions.

Last year, they reportedly approached a deal requiring Harvard to pay $500 million to regain access to federal funding, but Trump later increased his demand to $1 billion, stating that Harvard had been 'behaving very badly.'

The breakdown of these talks appears to have led directly to the current lawsuit.

The broader implications of this lawsuit extend beyond the immediate conflict between Harvard and the Trump administration, potentially setting important precedents for the relationship between the federal government and higher education institutions.

“The Trump administration slapped a new multibillion-dollar lawsuit against Harvard University on Friday, alleging that the school is in violation of a civil rights law and has failed to protect Jewish and Israeli students from discrimination”

CNN

The Justice Department's action is part of a larger campaign targeting elite universities that the administration believes are overrun by 'left-wing ideology, woke-ism, and antisemitism.'

CNN

Other universities have faced similar scrutiny, with Columbia University paying $220 million to restore federal research funding and the University of California system being sued over alleged discrimination against Jewish and Israeli employees at UCLA.

The Nexus Project, an antisemitism watchdog group, condemned the Harvard lawsuit, writing that the Trump administration 'continues to exploit legitimate Jewish concerns over antisemitism as a thinly veiled excuse to attack and bully major academic institutions.'

This case raises fundamental questions about the balance between civil rights protections and academic freedom, the extent of federal authority over private universities, and the appropriate role of government in policing campus speech and political expression.