Trump Says Prince Harry Is Not Speaking for the UK After Kyiv Security Forum Speech

Prince Harry delivered a lengthy, impassioned speech at the Kyiv Security Forum on Thursday during a surprise visit to Kyiv, urging the United States to honour its obligations in the Ukrainian conflict.

“You Browser Working London Working www”

AsatuNews.co.id

Multiple outlets quote Harry saying, “I am not here as a politician,” and adding, “I am here as a soldier who understands service, and a humanitarian.”

CBS News

Harry told delegates that “The United States has a singular role in this story,” and he linked that role to the moment “when Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons” and “America was part of the assurance that Ukraine’s sovereignty and borders would be respected.”

In the same speech, he framed the conflict as “not simply a war about territory,” but “a war about values. About sovereignty.”

He also warned that “the world must not grow used to this war or numb to its consequences,” and he said the principles “that underpin our shared democracy” were at stake.

Addressing President Putin, Harry said, “There is still a moment — now — to stop this war, to prevent further suffering for Ukrainians andRussians alike, and to choose a different course.”

Several reports also place the visit in a timeline, saying it was Harry’s third trip to Ukraine since Russia’s invasion in February 2022 and that he arrived at Kyiv’s central station after stepping off an overnight train from Poland.

After Harry’s Kyiv speech, President Donald Trump publicly pushed back on the idea that the Duke of Sussex was speaking for the UK.

The Times and Sky News both report Trump telling reporters, “I know one thing, Prince Harry is not speaking for the UK, that’s for sure,” and then adding, “I think I am speaking for the UK more than Prince Harry.”

Chester Standard

In the same exchange, Trump said, “But I appreciate his advice very much,” and he also asked, “How’s he doing? How’s his wife? Please give her my regards.”

DIE WELT likewise describes Trump’s response as a sharp counter, quoting him as saying, “Harry does not speak for the United Kingdom,” and “I think I speak for the United Kingdom more than Prince Harry does.”

The Kyiv Independent places the remarks at a White House event on April 23, saying Trump was asked by a reporter whether Harry’s comments were appropriate and then responded, “Prince Harry — how's he doing? Please give him my regards.”

The Guardian frames the moment as Trump “bristles” at Harry’s “passionate plea,” again quoting Trump’s line that “I think I am speaking for the UK more than Prince Harry … But I appreciate his advice very much.”

Across these accounts, Trump’s rebuke is tied directly to Harry’s call for stronger American engagement, while Trump’s comments also appear alongside personal remarks about Meghan Markle.

Harry’s Kyiv speech, as quoted by multiple outlets, combined calls for American leadership with a direct message to Vladimir Putin and a detailed description of alleged atrocities.

“The Duke of Sussex has directly appealed to Russian President Vladimir Putin to “stop this war”, as he condemned the “systematic war crimes” of the Ukrainian conflict”

Chester Standard

The Times reports that Harry warned the world must not lose sight of the conflict and said that “the principles that “underpin our shared democracy” were at stake,” while also quoting him on “mounting, documented evidence of systematic war crimes.”

In that same account, Harry said the evidence included “the forcible transfer of children,” which he said could amount to “an act of genocide.”

Chester Standard | Other provides an extended passage in which Harry condemned “systematic war crimes” and described “the “chilling” treatment of Ukraine’s children,” quoting him: “Across occupied territories, there is mounting, documented evidence of systematic war crimes: deliberate attacks on civilians, mass killings, torture, sexual violence, and the forced deportation of entire populations.”

Chester Standard | Other further quotes Harry saying, “Under international law, the forcible transfer of children from one national group to another is not just a war crime – it can constitute an act of genocide when carried out with intent to destroy a people’s identity.”

ITVX similarly quotes Harry’s framing of the conflict as a values struggle, including “Because what is happening here is not simply a war about territory. It is a war about values. About sovereignty.”

ITVX also quotes Harry’s appeal to Putin that “Years into this war… with immense losses and limited gains, it is increasingly clear that this path offers no victor - only more loss.”

Several reports place Harry’s intervention within a broader sequence of events involving the war’s start, his prior trips, and the diplomatic calendar around the United States.

The Times states that Harry’s third visit to Ukraine came “since Russia’s invasion in February 2022,” and it also notes that he made two trips to the country last year as a guest of the Superhumans charity.

DW

Sky News and ITVX both describe the Kyiv Security Forum speech as part of an “unannounced visit” and emphasize that it was Harry’s third trip since the war began in 2022.

Sky News also situates the Trump-Harry exchange in a wider diplomatic moment, saying Trump’s criticism comes “just days before the King is due to arrive in the US for a state visit” and that Charles and Queen Camilla will travel on Monday for a “four-day trip.”

The Independent similarly says Harry’s Kyiv trip comes days before his father, King Charles III, is scheduled to travel to the United States for a state visit from April 27 to 30.

DIE WELT adds that the timing is tied to King Charles preparing a state visit to Washington and says Harry’s remarks “stirs discontent in the transatlantic relationship,” while also noting that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have distanced themselves from the inner circle of the British royal family “a little over six years ago.”

ITVX provides additional travel detail, saying Harry gave the speech hours after stepping off an overnight train from Poland and arriving at Kyiv’s central station at 8am.

While all the outlets describe Trump’s rebuke of Prince Harry for Ukraine-related comments, they differ in emphasis and framing—ranging from personal remarks to broader diplomatic friction.

The Times focuses on Trump’s direct response to Harry’s call for US leadership, quoting Trump’s “I think I am speaking for the UK more than Prince Harry” line and then including Trump’s personal questions: “How’s he doing? How’s his wife? Please give her my regards.”

El Mundo

DIE WELT frames the exchange as a transatlantic political problem, saying Trump “countered” Harry’s Ukraine appeal and describing the moment as “ironically” stirring discontent in the relationship between the US and the UK.

Sky News highlights the timing relative to the King’s state visit, stating Trump’s criticism comes “just days before the King is due to arrive in the US for a state visit,” and it also notes that Harry “did not mentionMr Trumpby name.”

The Guardian, meanwhile, labels the moment as Trump “bristles” at Harry’s “passionate plea,” and it pairs the Trump quotes with a separate briefing that includes a Ukrainian MP’s drone interception account and EU leaders welcoming the end of diplomatic deadlock over a long-awaited €90bn (£78bn) loan for Ukraine.

The Kyiv Independent centers the White House setting, saying Trump made the remarks during an event at the White House on April 23 when he was asked by a reporter whether Harry’s comments were appropriate.

People adds a celebrity-politics angle by including Trump’s earlier headline-making comments about Meghan Markle, stating Trump made headlines in 2019 for calling Meghan “nasty,” before later denying the remark, and it ties that history to the “How’s his wife?” exchange.