
US Lawmakers Urge Sarah Ferguson to Testify About Epstein Ties
Key Takeaways
- US lawmakers urge Sarah Ferguson to testify about Epstein ties.
- Ferguson has not appeared publicly for months; representatives have not commented.
- Ex-husband's Epstein links cited by lawmakers in questioning Ferguson.
Lawmakers Demand Testimony
US lawmakers are intensifying pressure on Sarah Ferguson to provide sworn testimony regarding her connections to Jeffrey Epstein.
“She hasn’t been seen in public for months, and her representatives aren’t talking”
Prominent congressional figures are publicly calling for her cooperation in the ongoing investigation into the disgraced financier's criminal networks.

Congressman Suhas Subramanyam, a member of the House Oversight Committee investigating Epstein's prosecution, has stated that Ferguson possesses 'information related to the investigation' and should testify under oath before the committee.
Democratic Congresswoman Melanie Stansbury has echoed these calls, urging anyone with information about Epstein and his associates to cooperate to ensure justice for survivors.
Ferguson has not been seen publicly for months, fueling speculation about her whereabouts and potential involvement in media deals.
Her representatives have consistently declined to comment on these developments.
The family of prominent Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre has also added their voice to the chorus, expressing that they 'strongly believe' Ferguson should travel to the US to answer questions about her relationship with Epstein.
Epstein Document Revelations
Recent revelations from millions of documents released by the US Department of Justice have significantly altered perceptions of Ferguson's relationship with Epstein.
The documents suggest she was more deeply embroiled in his world than previously known.

The documents portray Ferguson as a 'needy figure' who was 'chasing money and support' - with her apparently describing herself to Epstein as 'very traumatised and alone'.
Evidence shows she praised Epstein in 2009 as 'the brother I have always wished for'.
She maintained contact with him even while he was imprisoned for soliciting prostitution from a minor.
Documents indicate she arranged for her daughters to have lunch with Epstein in Miami just days after his release from prison.
These revelations have made it clear to legal experts that Ferguson cannot claim ignorance of Epstein's criminal activities.
Testimony vs Media Deals
Congressional investigators have made it clear they are prepared to offer Ferguson flexibility in terms of how she might testify.
“She hasn’t been seen in public for months, and her representatives aren’t talking”
They insist she must agree to provide sworn testimony under oath.
Subramanyam told the BBC that committee members would be 'happy to work out terms that work for her' provided she agreed to speak under oath.
Lawmakers recognize the practical challenges of compelling someone without legal ties to the United States to testify.
This distinction between a media interview and sworn congressional testimony is crucial.
Ferguson could potentially command six-figure sums from US networks for a tell-all interview.
Such an interview would carry no legal weight and she could decline to answer certain questions or provide misleading information without consequence.
Sworn testimony before Congress represents an entirely different legal matter with potential consequences for perjury.
Ferguson's representatives have remained silent regarding these offers.
Speculation continues about potential media deals she may be considering.
Victims' Lawyers Demand Action
Legal experts representing Epstein's victims have been particularly vocal in calling for Ferguson to cooperate with authorities.
Prominent attorney Gloria Allred has declared that the new revelations make it clear Ferguson 'is not a victim in this story'.

Allred emphasized that Ferguson cannot claim ignorance of Epstein's crimes because she maintained contact with him after his conviction.
The lawyer called it 'long overdue' for Ferguson to testify under oath to Congress.
Allred also urged Ferguson to speak to police in the UK to answer their questions.
Biography author Andrew Lownie supported these calls, describing Ferguson as a 'material witness'.
Lownie noted that Ferguson 'visited his homes regularly' and should provide evidence in the US.
Her testimony would help investigators understand the full scope of Epstein's criminal networks.
Broader Investigation Context
The calls for Ferguson's testimony come against a backdrop of intense scrutiny surrounding Prince Andrew.
“She hasn’t been seen in public for months, and her representatives aren’t talking”
Ferguson's former husband has been at the center of Epstein-related controversy for years.

Andrew stepped back from royal duties in 2019 following a disastrous BBC interview about his relationship with Epstein.
In 2022, he reached a civil settlement with Virginia Giuffre without admitting liability.
US lawmakers have repeatedly called on Andrew to answer questions about his connections to Epstein.
These calls have so far been unsuccessful.
The investigation into Epstein's prosecution has expanded to include networks of associates and contacts.
Authorities seek to understand how Epstein continued operating despite earlier legal troubles.
Ferguson's knowledge of and association with Epstein after his conviction makes her potentially valuable to investigators.
Her testimony could help map the full extent of Epstein's operations and his network of powerful enablers.
More on Crime

Barcelona Police Say University of Alabama Student's Death in Spain Was Likely an Accident
36 sources compared

James Gracey Dies in Barcelona; Police Say Accident, Footage Shows He Fell Into Sea
98 sources compared

Epstein manipulated Norway's Crown Princess Mette-Marit
11 sources compared
Epstein's Former Attorney Darren Indyke Says He Had No Knowledge of Epstein's Crimes Against Women
10 sources compared