Brazil Central Bank Bars Crypto Settlement in Regulated eFX Cross-Border Payment Rails

Brazil’s central bank has tightened rules for cross-border payments by barring virtual assets from settlement inside regulated eFX payment rails, a move it framed as a targeted restriction rather than a blanket prohibition on crypto activity.

“A paradigm shift in the Brazilian financial system”

AmericaMalls & Retail

The policy is set out in Resolution BCB No. 561, which updates rules for international payment providers operating under Brazil’s foreign exchange framework.

AmericaMalls & Retail

Under the new rule, “crypto and stablecoins can no longer settle transactions within that supervised channel,” and payments or receipts between an eFX provider and a foreign counterparty must be completed through foreign exchange transactions or movement in a non-resident Brazilian real account.

Cointelegraph describes the measure as folding virtual assets into Brazil’s financial and foreign exchange rulebook as stablecoins become a larger part of the country’s crypto activity.

CoinCentral and crypto.news both emphasize that the rule “does not ban crypto transfers in Brazil,” but instead “excludes virtual assets and stablecoins from regulated eFX channels.”

The restriction applies to eFX services, which cover certain cross-border payments and transfers, and it also reaches eFX service providers in a transitional period that are not yet approved.

The central bank’s approach, as described across the coverage, is to close “one regulated route for virtual asset settlement” while leaving other channels for crypto transfers outside the restricted eFX framework.

Multiple outlets describe the mechanics of Resolution BCB No. 561 as a settlement requirement tied to regulated international payment rails rather than a prohibition on crypto ownership or trading.

crypto.news states that “payments or receipts between an eFX provider and a foreign counterparty must use foreign exchange transactions,” and it adds that providers “may also use movement in a non-resident Brazilian real account.”

BFM

The same outlet says “The resolution bans the use of virtual assets for those payments and receipts,” which it translates into a practical effect: “crypto and stablecoins cannot settle transactions inside the regulated eFX channel.”

WEEX similarly reports that the central bank “prohibits the use of virtual assets for settlement in regulated eFX international payment and transfer services,” and it says the new regulation requires payments or receipts between eFX service providers and foreign counterparties to be completed through foreign exchange transactions or non-resident Brazilian real accounts.

Cointelegraph provides additional context by tying the eFX rule to earlier central bank steps, noting that in November 2025 the central bank detailed new rules for virtual asset service providers, including authorization requirements and rules for services involving virtual assets in the foreign-exchange market.

Bitget’s write-up stresses that the policy “focuses specifically on settlement activity within regulated payment rails rather than on crypto ownership, trading, or peer-to-peer transfers.”

It also frames the restriction as applying to licensed corridors through which banks, fintechs, and remittance operators move funds internationally under central bank supervision.

The rule’s tightening is presented as part of a broader effort by Brazil’s central bank to increase oversight as stablecoins take on a larger role in local crypto-linked flows.

“Bitget App Trade smarter Open [](https://www”

Bitget

CoinCentral says regulators “added virtual assets to the financial and foreign exchange rulebook in November 2025,” and it links that step to “authorization requirements for virtual asset service providers.”

Cointelegraph adds that the central bank’s push follows concern over the use of stablecoins for payments and cross-border transfers, and it notes that in February Reuters reported BCB Governor Gabriel Galipolo saying crypto use had surged over the previous two to three years with about 90% of flows linked to stablecoins.

Cointelegraph further reports that in a technical note sent to Congress and seen by Cointelegraph Brasil, the central bank said stablecoins issued by entities not subject to BCB supervision could face “a ban or strict conditions in the domestic market.”

It specifies that “real-denominated stablecoins issued outside BCB supervision may pose risks to regulatory equality and monetary sovereignty,” while “foreign-currency stablecoins raise concerns around jurisdiction, capital flows and fragmentation of the payments system.”

crypto.news similarly states that Brazil is tightening oversight of crypto-linked payment flows as stablecoins make up “about 90% of reported crypto flows,” and it attributes concerns to taxation, money laundering, and backing.

CoinCentral also says the central bank has linked stablecoin flows to “concerns over taxation, laundering risks, and asset backing,” and it says officials reviewed tokens issued outside Brazil’s regulatory perimeter.

Resolution BCB No. 561 includes transition rules that affect firms not yet listed as approved eFX providers, according to the coverage.

CoinCentral says the resolution “also includes transition rules for firms outside the approved eFX provider list,” and it adds that “These companies may continue operations while seeking central bank authorization.”

CoinDesk

It specifies that “They must file applications by May 31, 2027,” and it says those firms “must follow the same settlement standards during the transition period.”

CoinCentral further states that “Their payments and receipts must use foreign exchange transactions or non-resident real accounts,” and it reiterates that “Virtual assets remain barred even before final approval.”

crypto.news likewise describes transitional coverage, saying “This restriction also applies to eFX service providers that have not yet been approved but are in a transitional period,” and it repeats that they may continue operating if they seek central bank approval by May 31, 2027.

Bitget’s account focuses on operational adjustments for licensed payment providers, stating that “Compliance teams at affected institutions will need to audit existing settlement flows and confirm that no crypto assets are used in the final settlement step of regulated cross-border transactions.”

Across the sources, the practical implication is that regulated eFX providers must reconfigure settlement workflows to ensure foreign exchange transactions or non-resident Brazilian real accounts are used instead of crypto or stablecoins.

While Brazil’s central bank restricts crypto settlement inside regulated eFX rails, Ripple is moving in the opposite direction on the corporate side by seeking regulatory approval for virtual-asset services in Brazil.

“Ripple busca expandir servicios de criptomonedas y pagos en Brasil La firma de blockchain está añadiendo herramientas de custodia, pagos y corretaje para la gestión de activos digitales y la tokenización, mientras planea solicitar la aprobación regulatoria del banco central”

CoinDesk

DiarioBitcoin reports that Ripple “planea solicitar una licencia VASP ante el Banco Central de Brasil,” and it frames the move as part of an expansion that combines “pagos transfronterizos, custodia cripto, corretaje y tesorería.”

Cointelegraph

CoinDesk similarly says Ripple “planea solicitar una licencia de Proveedor de Servicios de Activos Virtuales ante el banco central del país,” and it describes the company as adding “herramientas de custodia, pagos y corretaje para la gestión de activos digitales y la tokenización.”

CoinDesk also quotes Ripple’s president, Monica Long, saying: “Latinoamérica siempre ha sido un mercado prioritario para Ripple — no solo por la magnitud de la oportunidad, sino porque Brasil ha desarrollado uno de los ecosistemas financieros más avanzados y visionarios del mundo,” in a comunicado.

The CoinDesk report ties Ripple’s Brazil expansion to a broader corporate push, saying it comes as Ripple has been expanding “mediante adquisiciones multimillonarias” and the launch of a stablecoin in dollars, “Ripple USD (RLUSD).”

It also provides specific acquisition figures, stating Ripple bought Hidden Road for “1.250 millones de dólares” and acquired GTreasury for “1.000 millones de dólares.”

In the context of Brazil’s eFX settlement ban, the juxtaposition in the sources is clear: the central bank is limiting virtual-asset settlement in regulated cross-border payment rails, while Ripple is seeking a VASP license to expand institutional crypto services in Brazil’s regulatory environment.