Full story
Mandate release and context
The Ethereum Foundation published a 38-page EF Mandate that defines its philosophy, role, and responsibilities as steward of the network, framing itself as a custodian rather than an owner amid internal transitions.
“The Ethereum Foundation published a 38-page document outlining its philosophy and role as a steward of the network.”
The document is described as a sweeping statement of the foundation’s long-term role and was released at a moment of organisational change, including “the resignation earlier this year of one of the foundation’s co-executive directors.”
The Foundation publicly released the mandate on March 13, 2026 through its board, positioning the EF as the primary custodian of Ethereum rather than its ruler.
CROPS core principles
At the heart of the mandate is the CROPS framework: censorship resistance, open-source freedom, privacy, and security.
The EF states these four properties “must remain, as an indivisible whole,” and the new document repeatedly frames infrastructure and application development around protecting those properties.
Multiple summaries characterise the mandate as prioritising privacy protection, robust security, and resistance to censorship across both protocol and application layers.
Self-sovereignty emphasis
The mandate foregrounds user self-sovereignty as Ethereum’s central aim, asserting that “a user has the final say over their identities, assets, actions, and agents.”
“At the center of the mandate is the concept of self-sovereignty, which the foundation describes as Ethereum’s core purpose.”
The EF frames its own success in part by how unnecessary it becomes as the ecosystem matures and says it intends to reduce its influence while safeguarding decentralised user control.
The document therefore links institutional restraint with the technical goal of preserving individual control and autonomy on-chain.
Technical priorities
The EF Mandate sets clear technical priorities meant to preserve CROPS while guiding future development choices: account abstraction, selective transaction aggregation, post-quantum cryptography research, and mechanisms to guarantee transaction inclusion such as FOCIL are specifically highlighted.
The document ties these technical efforts directly to preserving privacy and censorship resistance, and the mandate opposes architectural choices that would prioritise short‑term commercial gains over long‑term decentralisation.
Governance and stewardship
Governance and resource allocation are reframed toward being an impartial custodian: the EF positions itself as a neutral steward that will channel support toward systems that enhance user protection and autonomy rather than chase immediate commercial metrics.
“This official statement crystallizes the organization’s identity as a neutral infrastructure steward rather than a conventional product development entity.”
The mandate explicitly describes the Foundation as “not the parent, owner, or ruler of Ethereum” and commits to measuring success by how unnecessary EF becomes, reflecting a deliberate shift toward enabling independent ecosystem governance.