Full story
Comey Surrenders in Virginia
Former FBI Director James Comey surrendered to authorities in Virginia and appeared in federal court on Wednesday over charges accusing him of threatening President Donald Trump’s life through a social media post.
Multiple outlets described the hearing as brief, with WRAL saying it lasted “less than 10 minutes” and CNN reporting Comey was allowed to leave court with “no conditions of release after a brief hearing that lasted less than 10 minutes.”
Comey’s attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald, told Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick that he would argue the case is a “vindictive prosecution,” and Fitzpatrick said, “I don’t see why they’d be necessary this time.”
The charges, as described by Reuters and others, stem from a May 2025 Instagram post in which Comey posted a photo of seashells arranged to form the numbers “86 47” on a beach in North Carolina.
Prosecutors allege the arrangement conveyed a threat, and the indictment says Comey “knowingly and willfully did transmit in interstate and foreign commerce a communication that contained a threat to kill the President, Donald J. Trump.”
Comey did not enter a plea during the Wednesday appearance, and BBC reported he “did not enter a plea or speak during his brief appearance at a Virginia court on Wednesday afternoon.”
In court, Fitzpatrick referenced the prior case, and the judge said, “They weren’t necessary last time and I don’t see why they should be this time,” according to CNBC.
The Instagram Post and Charges
The case centers on a photo Comey posted on Instagram in May 2025 showing seashells arranged to read “86 47” on a beach in North Carolina, a gesture Trump described as a coded threat.
CNBC said the photo was posted “last May” and that Trump and the Department of Justice claimed the numbers “86 47” represented a threat to assassinate Trump, with “86” described as slang for ejecting or removing a person and Trump as the 47th president.
DW described the post as a seashell arrangement in the shape of the numbers 86 and 47, and said Trump said the gesture was a coded threat.
TRT World said Comey posted the photo “in May 2025” and that he faces one count of “willfully making a threat to take the life of and to inflict bodily harm upon the president of the United States” and another of making an interstate threat, with each charge carrying a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.
BBC reported that prosecutors allege the image “encourages violence against Trump, the 47th president,” and said Comey denied any wrongdoing, saying he did not know what the numbers meant.
Comey’s own account, as quoted by BBC, was that he assumed the shells were “a political message,” writing, “I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me, but I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.”
Trump, speaking to a reporter at the White House, told the press, “Well, if anybody knows anything about crime, they know '86, you know ... a mob term for 'kill him,'” and also said “probably” when asked if his life was in danger.
Vindictive Prosecution Claims
Comey’s defense framed the case as punishment for exercising legal rights and speaking out against Trump, with multiple outlets quoting Fitzgerald’s and Comey’s positions.
CNBC said Comey’s lawyer, Patrick Fitzgerald, told Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick that he intends to file a motion to dismiss on grounds of “vindictive prosecution,” and it noted Fitzgerald had filed a similar motion when Comey was indicted in another federal criminal case last fall that was later tossed out on other grounds.
DW described Fitzgerald’s argument as a “vindictive prosecution,” meaning the case was brought to punish Comey for exercising his legal rights, and it also quoted John Keller saying, “The '86' is ambiguous,” and that it “doesn't necessarily threaten violence.”
WRAL reported that Fitzgerald told the court they would be challenging the case by claiming a “vindictive and selective prosecution,” and it said Comey is expected to appear in court in North Carolina at a later date.
BBC said Fitzgerald would seek dismissal on grounds of “selective and vindictive prosecution,” arguing he was targeted for speaking out against Trump.
Comey also spoke publicly in a video statement on Tuesday, and BBC quoted him saying, “This won't be the end of it - but I'm still innocent, I'm still not afraid and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary.”
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the indictment when asked about whether anyone who posted the numbers “8647” would face charges, telling reporters, “Every threat case is different,” and “It depends on the investigation.”
Political Backdrop and Prior Case
The indictment comes after a prior federal case against Comey that was dismissed, and multiple outlets tied the new prosecution to Trump’s broader push to target political adversaries.
CNBC said the indictment was the second against Comey in less than a year and that it was unsealed in North Carolina after his first appearance in Alexandria because it was the closest federal court to his home.
BBC said the case marked the second time the justice department has brought criminal charges against Comey, and it described the earlier case as charges that he lied to Congress and obstructed a congressional proceeding, which a federal judge dismissed in November.
BBC quoted that dismissal as being due to prosecutor Lindsey Halligan’s “invalid” appointment as US attorney, and it said the case was dismissed because of that “invalid” appointment.
TRT World similarly said that in September, Comey was charged with making false statements to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding, and that a federal judge threw out that case because the prosecutor was unlawfully appointed.
CNN and WRAL both described the new case as a reinvigorated effort to satisfy Trump’s demands to investigate foes, with CNN saying the new case represents a “reinvigorated effort to satisfy Trump’s demands to investigate his foes.”
TRT World added that Democrats are viewing the latest indictment in a similar light, quoting Senator Dick Durbin calling the charges “baseless” and “petty retribution.”
Legal Experts, Penalties, and Next Steps
As the case proceeds, outlets highlighted both the statutory exposure and the skepticism from legal voices.
“Watch CBS News Copyright ©2026 CBS Interactive Inc”
TRT World said each charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, and it described Comey’s two counts as threatening the president’s life and transmitting an interstate threat.
BBC likewise said each charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and reported that Judge William Fitzpatrick read the charges, with Comey nodding as he was read his rights and later smiling back at his family when he was leaving, as CBS News reported.
CNN reported that the US Attorney Ellis Boyle was in the courtroom Wednesday and that no date had been set for Comey’s arraignment or first appearance in North Carolina.
On the merits, Eugene Volokh told CNN Tuesday, “This is not going anywhere. This is clearly not a punishable threat,” and DW quoted John Keller saying, “It doesn't necessarily threaten violence.”
BBC also quoted Republican Senator Thom Tillis saying, “I hope there's more to it than just the picture in the sand,” and it quoted Jimmy Gurulé calling the indictment “an embarrassment to the American criminal justice system.”
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told reporters that the case had been investigated “for the past year,” and BBC quoted Blanche saying, “People should be very wary of threatening the life of President Trump because that is a crime. Full stop.”
