President Donald Trump Says He Can End Iran War; Israel Vows No Time Limit

President Donald Trump has publicly asserted he can bring the war with Iran to a close and has repeatedly said the campaign is progressing faster than expected, while offering few concrete timelines.

“Donald Trump has said that the war with Iran may end “soon” because there is “practically nothing left” for the United States military to bomb”

Al Jazeera

Trump told multiple outlets that “The war is going great. We are way ahead of the timetable. We have done more damage than we thought possible, even in the original six-week period,” and Reuters reporting said he “predicted the conflict would end well before the initial four-week time frame he had laid out, ‌though he has not defined what victory would look like.”

Al Jazeera

At the same time, major news outlets noted inconsistent messaging from the White House: “President Donald Trump and his administration have so far offered mixed messages and contradictory explanations on the joint US-Israeli military campaign against Iran.”

These mixed signals have left the endgame unclear even as Trump says the decision to end the operation would be coordinated with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Israel has signalled it will not limit the duration of its campaign, with Israeli officials saying operations will continue until objectives are achieved.

As reported, “The operation will continue without any time limit, as long as required, until we accomplish all objectives and achieve victory in the campaign,” Katz said, according to The Times of Israel.

BBC

Reuters coverage noted Israel’s political aim is sweeping, saying “Israel says its war aim is to overthrow Iran's system of clerical rule,” and allied military postures and base use underscore a long-running commitment rather than a short strike: CNN reported that the US has begun using British bases “for specific defensive operations to prevent Iran firing missiles into the region,” and that allied aircraft continue regional patrols.

That public insistence on an open-ended campaign contrasts with US statements that at times suggested quicker timelines.

Tehran has pushed back that it will set the conditions for any end to fighting and has outlined demands that complicate a US- or Israeli-declared ceasefire.

Al Jazeera reported that “Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian laid out on Wednesday Tehran’s conditions for ending the war, including compensation for the US-Israeli assault and “firm” international guarantees that Iran would not be attacked again.”

Reuters coverage similarly recorded an uncompromising Tehran voice: “We are the ones who will determine the end of the war," a spokesperson said, according to state media.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards also warned of economic countermeasures, saying they would not allow "one liter of oil" to leave the region if attacks continue—moves that together suggest Tehran will not accept a unilateral US-declared ceasefire.

The fighting and allied strikes have already inflicted heavy casualties and broad economic disruption, and leaders’ rhetoric has added market volatility.

Al Jazeera reported that “The US and Israel have launched thousands of bombs against Iran, killing at least 1,300 people.”

marketscreener

Reuters coverage put similar numbers on civilian tolls: “U.S.-Israeli attacks have killed at least 1,332 Iranian civilians and wounded thousands, according to Iran's U.N. ambassador.”

The conflict has also choked global energy flows: “The war has effectively shut the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for global oil and liquefied natural gas transport,” Reuters wrote, and the BBC noted that Trump’s media outreach briefly calmed markets: “His telephone spree, at least in an economic sense, had the desired effect. Stock markets rallied, and the price of a barrel of oil – which had reached $120 earlier in the day - dropped below $90.”

The US has also been evacuating nationals: “The US 'has completed over a dozen charter flights and has safely evacuated thousands of Americans from the Middle East,' a top State Department official said Saturday.”

Allied military postures and domestic politics complicate prospects for a clean, rapid end.

“Despite easing, analysts note that underlying risks remain”

Mathrubhumi English

Britain has put one of its carriers on higher readiness, CNN reported that “One of Britain’s two aircraft carriers has been put on an increased state of readiness, “reducing the time it would take to set sail for any deployment,”” and the UK has faced criticism over the timing of deployments to protect regional allies.

Mathrubhumi English

Al Jazeera observed that “the US president has repeatedly made pronouncements about the war ending soon, but Washington has not provided a clear timeline for concluding the military offensive.”

Reuters also described political-calculation moves such as potential oil-sanctions waivers: “After speaking with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump said the United States will waive oil-related sanctions on 'some countries' to ease the shortage.”

Taken together, the reporting portrays a war with open-ended political aims, diverging public timelines and widening allied involvement that make an early, uncontested end unlikely.