
‘Sounds familiar’: how the US-Israeli war in Iran parallels Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
Key Takeaways
- US-Israel campaign against Iran features shifting goals, unclear timelines, and a flimsy pretext.
- Putin's 2022 invasion sent a massive army into Ukraine, an unprovoked attack causing heavy losses.
- The article stresses the parallels are imperfect and the comparison is far from exact.
US-Israel campaign vs Iran
The Guardian argues that the US-Israel campaign against Iran carries notable parallels with Vladimir Putin’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, despite important differences.
“Shifting goals, unclear timelines and a flimsy pretext: at times, the US-Israel campaign against Iran carries curious parallels of Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine”
The article states that Russia sent a massive army across Ukraine’s borders in an unprovoked invasion of a democratic state that quickly resulted in heavy losses.

It says the United States has so far largely limited its involvement to airstrikes against Iran’s authoritarian regime.
It says early US statements framed strikes as preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and emphasised degrading Iran’s missile capabilities and its regional proxy infrastructure.
The article says stated goals have become more maximalist, with Donald Trump saying Iran’s leadership should be replaced and calling for Tehran’s "unconditional surrender".
Scholars, the article notes, say the legal justification is nonexistent.
Avoiding the word 'war'
The piece highlights similarities in rhetoric and a reluctance to use the word 'war'.
It quotes US defence secretary Pete Hegseth saying the US 'didn’t start this war, but under President Trump, we are finishing it.'

It notes that Putin used strikingly similar language in February 2022, saying 'We didn’t start the so-called war in Ukraine... We are trying to finish it.'
The Guardian reports that some US figures, like House speaker Mike Johnson, called the action a 'limited operation.'
Putin avoids the term 'war,' calls his campaign a 'special military operation,' and enforces that narrative through censorship that has jailed critics.
The article also notes how media and political elites shifted positions in Russia.
It says some US commentators who criticised Russia’s invasion are struggling to maintain the same clarity, citing the former US ambassador to Moscow under Barack Obama, Michael McFaul.
McFaul wrote on X that he still wants 'our armed forces to win' despite disagreeing with the decision and process.
Risks of vague objectives
The article warns of the risks of vague objectives and escalation.
“Shifting goals, unclear timelines and a flimsy pretext: at times, the US-Israel campaign against Iran carries curious parallels of Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine”
It cites media reports that Trump has raised the possibility of sending elite troops into Iran to secure stockpiles of enriched uranium.
It recalls that in Ukraine Russia deployed elite airborne forces early on in a risky operation that ended in heavy losses.
Danny Citrinowicz of the Atlantic Council is quoted warning that when strategic goals become too ambitious a campaign can slide into a war of attrition.
He urged clearly defined, measurable objectives as a way to avoid that outcome.
The piece closes with retired Russian diplomat Vladimir Frolov’s dry comment: 'Sounds familiar.'
More on Iran-Israel

Escalation in Iran Pushes Oil Near $120, Sparks Gas Price Surge in Los Angeles
10 sources compared

U.S. Intercepts Iran Message Activating Sleeper Cells After U.S.-Israel Strike Kills Khamenei
14 sources compared

Iran Threatens To Confiscate Property Of Iranians Abroad Who Support US And Israel
14 sources compared

Ukraine Sends Drones, Experts to Shield U.S. Bases in Jordan From Iran
16 sources compared