
South Carolina Supreme Court Overturns Alex Murdaugh Murder Convictions, Orders New Trial
Key Takeaways
- South Carolina Supreme Court overturned Murdaugh's double murder convictions and ordered a new trial.
- Court cited Becky Hill's improper external influence on the jury, denying a fair trial.
- Prosecutors plan to retry Murdaugh for wife and son murders.
Convictions Overturned
The South Carolina Supreme Court overturned Alex Murdaugh’s murder convictions and ordered a new trial, finding that Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca “Becky” Hill’s “improper external influence” on the jury denied him a fair trial.
“Alex Murdaugh murder convictions overturned by South Carolina Supreme Court The court found that the court clerk's actions denied him a fair trial”
The court said Hill’s “shocking” interference included suggesting to jurors that they could not trust Murdaugh’s testimony, and it also faulted the trial judge for allowing evidence of Murdaugh’s financial crimes into the murder case.

Murdaugh’s wife, Margaret “Maggie” Murdaugh, 52, and younger son, Paul Murdaugh, 22, were found dead from multiple gunshot wounds near the dog kennels at the family’s hunting estate in 2021, and Murdaugh was convicted in 2023 after a six-week trial.
After the ruling, South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson said his office would “aggressively” seek to retry Murdaugh for the murders “as soon as possible,” while Murdaugh’s lawyers said they “look forward to a new trial conducted consistent with the Constitution.”
Quotes and Dispute
In the appeals record, Murdaugh’s defense argued Hill tampered with the jury by “advising it not to believe Murdaugh's testimony,” pressuring jurors toward a quick guilty verdict, and misrepresenting information to the trial court.
Lead prosecutor Creighton Waters countered during the February hearing that Hill made a “few fleeting comments” over a six-week trial with nearly 90 witnesses and almost 600 exhibits, arguing they were not enough to influence the verdict.
Chief Justice John Kittredge called Hill a “rogue clerk of court” and said he wanted to note that the “overwhelming majority” of clerks in the state are “dedicated, conscientious public servants” who “do not act like this.”
NBC News reported that Murdaugh told a judge during sentencing in March 2023, “I respect this court, but I’m innocent,” and it quoted the judge, Clifton Newman, responding, “It might not have been you.”
What Happens Next
The Supreme Court’s decision does not mean Murdaugh will be released, because he is serving a 40-year federal sentence after pleading guilty to stealing some $12 million from his clients and also is serving a concurrent 27-year sentence for state financial crimes.
The ruling remanded the case for a new trial, and the court said it had “no choice” but to reverse the denial of Murdaugh’s motion for a new trial due to Hill’s improper external influences on the jury.
PBS reported that the justices said the conduct by the court clerk “egregiously attacked Murdaugh's credibility” by suggesting to jurors his testimony could not be trusted, while also saying the trial judge went too far in allowing evidence of Murdaugh’s financial crimes into his murder trial.
BBC added that the supreme court ordered a new trial in the June 2021 killings, and it quoted South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson saying his office would “aggressively seek to retry Alex Murdaugh for the murders of Maggie and Paul as soon as possible.”
More on USA

JD Vance Defers $1.3 Billion In Medicaid Reimbursements To California Over Fraud Concerns
15 sources compared

ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons Announces Nationwide OPT Fraud Crackdown With Over 10,000 Students Flagged
14 sources compared

Mike Huckabee Says Israel Sent Iron Dome Batteries And Personnel To United Arab Emirates
15 sources compared

CBO Estimates Trump’s Golden Dome Missile Defense Costs $1.2 Trillion Over 20 Years
20 sources compared