Trump Claims Virginia Redistricting Vote Was Rigged as Courts Block Plan

A Virginia redistricting referendum approved by voters on Tuesday triggered a rapid legal fight that left the state’s congressional map in limbo as courts moved to block the measure.

“Skip to main content Updated 17 hours ago - Politics & Policy Trump's redistricting war leaves Republicans worse off Andrew Pantazi, Avery Lotz email (opens in new window) sms (opens in new window) facebook (opens in new window) twitter (opens in new window) linkedin (opens in new window) bluesky (opens in new window) Add Axios as your preferred source to see more of our stories on Google”

Axios

France 24 reported that US President Donald Trump alleged without evidence that the Virginia vote approving a congressional redistricting plan favouring Democrats was “rigged,” as a county judge moved to block the measure.

BBC

The BBC said a Virginia judge on Wednesday paused the certification of referendum results that would lead to redrawing the state’s congressional map, after the court deemed the new map and the bill that triggered it unconstitutional.

CNN described Trump’s post on Wednesday on Truth Social, quoting “A RIGGED ELECTION TOOK PLACE LAST NIGHT IN THE GREAT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA!” and adding that he blamed a “massive ‘Mail In Ballot Drop!’”.

Axios, meanwhile, framed the political impact as a reversal for Republicans, saying Trump’s redistricting war “appears to have backfired” after Virginia’s vote.

The BBC also put the midterm stakes in concrete terms, saying the redistricting could help Democrats win as many as four House seats currently held by Republicans.

In the background of the court fight, the BBC reported the House balance of power as “217 Republicans, 212 Democrats, and one independent, who caucuses with Republicans,” and said the midterms take place in November.

The legal challenge centered on whether the referendum and the bill that triggered the special election followed constitutional and procedural requirements, with multiple outlets describing a judge’s decision to freeze the results.

Washington Examiner reported that the Tazewell Circuit Court ruled on Wednesday that Virginia’s redistricting referendum was unconstitutional, issuing an injunction blocking certification and declaring all votes for or against the proposed constitutional amendment essentially void.

CNBC

CNBC said the circuit court judge blocked the results of the congressional redistricting referendum and quoted Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones vowing to fight the order issued by Tazewell County Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley, a Republican appointee.

CNBC also described Hurley’s reasoning, saying the judge ruled the referendum question was void “ab initio” and wrote that “Any and all votes for or against the proposed constitutional amendment in the April 21, 2026 special election are ineffective.”

BBC similarly said the court deemed the new map and the bill that triggered it unconstitutional, following a lawsuit from the Republican National Committee.

France 24 added that a county judge moved to block the measure and that the Supreme Court of Virginia allowed the referendum to proceed but may end up invalidating it.

In the same legal arc, France 24 said Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones would ask the state’s Court of Appeals to overturn Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley Jr.’s order, which called the ballot language “flagrantly misleading” and blocked the state from certifying Tuesday’s referendum results.

Trump’s response to the Virginia referendum loss and the court pause centered on claims that mail-in ballots were responsible, and multiple outlets quoted his language while also describing the lack of evidence.

“A Virginia circuit court judge on Wednesday issued an order blocking the results of a congressional redistricting referendum that could net Democrats four extra seats in the U”

CNBC

France 24 said Trump wrote in a social media post that “A RIGGED ELECTION TOOK PLACE LAST NIGHT IN THE GREAT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA!” and blamed mail-in ballots for the outcome.

CNN described the same post on Truth Social and quoted Trump saying “All day long Republicans were winning, the Spirit was unbelievable, until the very end when, of course, there was a massive ‘Mail In Ballot Drop!’” and that “the Democrats eked out another Crooked Victory!”

CNN also argued that Trump’s narrative didn’t hold up, stating there was “precisely zero evidence on Wednesday of outcome-changing fraud with mail-in ballots.”

CNN further quoted Kyle Kondik of Sabato’s Crystal Ball posting on X at 7:59 p.m., with CNN quoting “Kind of reminds me of the old, more competitive days in VA when the Rs would lead before the Fairfax hammer dropped.”

In the same dispute, CNBC quoted Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones saying, “Virginia voters have spoken, and an activist judge should not have veto power over the People's vote,” and said the office would immediately file an appeal in the Court of Appeals.

The Washington Examiner account also described Trump’s criticism of ballot language, quoting him saying, “The language on the Referendum was purposefully unintelligible and deceptive,” and adding another post in which he said, “As everyone knows, I am an extraordinarily brilliant person, and even I had no idea what the hell they were talking about in the Referendum.”

Outlet coverage diverged on how to interpret the Virginia referendum, with some emphasizing Trump’s allegations and others emphasizing court process, vote counting, and the broader national redistricting contest.

France 24 framed the story around Trump’s claim of a “rigged” vote while the court moved to block the redistricting map, and it described the Supreme Court of Virginia allowing the referendum to proceed but potentially invalidating it.

Democracy Docket

BBC focused on the court pause and the constitutional finding, saying the court deemed the new map and the bill unconstitutional after a lawsuit from the Republican National Committee, and it quoted Trump’s social media claim that “A RIGGED ELECTION TOOK PLACE LAST NIGHT.”

CNN, by contrast, centered on rebutting Trump’s narrative, saying his narrative about the Virginia defeat “doesn’t hold up to even the most basic of scrutiny” and quoting his Truth Social post while also describing vote-count dynamics across counties.

Axios treated the episode as a strategic political setback, saying Trump’s redistricting war “appears to have backfired” and using comparisons of how Harris and Biden would have carried seats under different results.

Washington Examiner and CNBC both emphasized the court’s injunction and the expectation of appeal, with Washington Examiner saying the case was expected to be appealed immediately to the Virginia Supreme Court and CNBC quoting Jay Jones’s plan to appeal.

Politico added a different political lens, reporting that “Virginia Republicans point fingers after gerrymandering loss” and quoting a GOP operative saying, “You’d be hard pressed to find a single Republican tonight who doesn’t think the GOP should’ve done more in Virginia.”

NPR also framed the vote as a Democratic gain in the national redistricting push, saying Democrats gain edge over Trump’s national effort and describing the possibility that the Virginia delegation “could go to 10-to-1 under the new map,” even as the move faced court challenges.

The Virginia referendum outcome and the court pause set up a sequence of appeals and a broader national redistricting contest that could extend into other states and the US Supreme Court.

“Voters in Virginia have greenlit a redistricting plan that could see Democrats gain up to four more seats in Congress during the 2026 midterm elections”

Democracy Docket

CNBC said Jay Jones vowed to appeal the order issued by Judge Jack Hurley, and it also described the referendum as passing by three percentage points and allowing for a temporary adoption of new district lines before returning control of redistricting to an independent commission in 2031.

France 24

BBC said the state would appeal, and it described the national redistricting race that began after Trump urged conservative states to re-examine voting maps to help Republicans keep their congressional majority.

Axios said the Virginia Supreme Court will likely weigh in on the ruling and several other lawsuits challenging redistricting, and it pointed to Florida legislators returning to Tallahassee later this month for a delayed special session.

NPR similarly said Florida lawmakers might be up next and described Ron DeSantis calling lawmakers back to the Capitol next week to consider redistricting that could favor Republicans.

Democracy Docket described the Virginia vote as a win for Democrats that “could see Democrats gain up to four more seats in Congress during the 2026 midterm elections,” while also emphasizing that the new congressional map is not guaranteed to be enacted because it faces multiple legal challenges from Republicans.

The stakes were also framed in terms of investigations and control of Congress, with BBC saying Democratic House control could open Trump up to Democratic-led congressional investigations and NPR describing Republicans’ concern about investigations or impeachment.

Finally, Axios and NPR both highlighted a potential US Supreme Court case that could weaken the federal Voting Rights Act, with Axios saying the high court is poised to rule on a Louisiana case and NPR saying the Supreme Court is considering a case that could end up weakening the federal Voting Rights Act.