Britain, Canada, Italy and Other Major Allies Refuse to Join Trump's Board of Peace
Image: WJBF

Britain, Canada, Italy and Other Major Allies Refuse to Join Trump's Board of Peace

29 January, 2026.USA.18 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Britain, Canada, Italy and other major Western allies declined to join the Board.
  • Twenty-six countries, including several Middle Eastern states, agreed to join the Board.
  • Allies opposed the Board citing an unclear mandate and overlap with United Nations roles.

Trump's Davos peace plan

President Trump unveiled a US-led 'Board of Peace' at Davos, pitching it as a body to oversee Gaza's ceasefire sustainment and reconstruction and unveiling redevelopment ideas such as 'New Gaza' and 'New Rafah'.

I can’t summarize an article because the only text you provided is “All Rights Reserved

24NewsHD24NewsHD

The announcement produced a mixed response, with Trump saying once the group is formed 'we can do pretty much whatever we want to do'.

Image from 24NewsHD
24NewsHD24NewsHD

Organizers say dozens of countries have been invited and the US reports multiple signups.

Major Western powers and long-standing U.S. allies have largely refused or held back from joining.

U.N. officials have stressed that international peace and security remain the Security Council's remit.

Western allies' refusals

Britain, Canada, Italy and several other major Western allies explicitly declined to join or were reported to have been rebuffed as invitations were issued.

The Independent listed Britain among a set of European countries that have "declined to join," and News.au and colombiaone likewise report that many European states — including the U.K., Italy, France, Germany, Norway, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden — refused participation.

Image from Al-Jazeera Net
Al-Jazeera NetAl-Jazeera Net

Canada’s role became contentious in some accounts: News.au and other outlets say Canada’s invitation was reportedly revoked after it refused to pay a reported $1 billion fee for a permanent seat.

Concerns about board authority

Reporting on a draft resolution suggested the chair (identified as President Trump in that draft) would have sweeping authorities, including nominating senior officials, approving or suspending board resolutions, and appointing a successor.

Human rights groups and diplomats warned the structure risked sidelining the U.N. and empowering autocrats.

Others warned the rollout turned the initiative into what critics called a partisan or personality-driven forum.

Regional reactions to proposal

Reactions and calculations split along regional lines.

Several Middle Eastern and emerging nations reportedly accepted or are reported as participants, with sources listing Türkiye, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Indonesia, Pakistan and the UAE among others.

Image from Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Australian Broadcasting CorporationAustralian Broadcasting Corporation

Smaller U.S. partners such as New Zealand explicitly declined in its current form and said any role must align with the UN Charter.

Some outlets emphasize a core Western rejection by France, the U.K. and Germany.

Other outlets point to a mix of acceptances from non-Western states that may reflect regional influence strategies rather than endorsement of the U.S. model.

Reactions to oversight board

Observers and critics say the board's uncertain legal status, partisan rollout and ambiguous remit explain why Britain, Canada, Italy and others have so far refused to participate.

New Zealand has declined Donald Trump's invitation to join his proposed "Board of Peace," with the country's foreign minister demanding more clarity about the US president's plan

Australian Broadcasting CorporationAustralian Broadcasting Corporation

The Associated Press summarises the backlash as a reaffirmation of support for the U.N. rules-based system.

Image from Buenos Aires Times
Buenos Aires TimesBuenos Aires Times

Dailysabah and WJBF report that leaders and the U.N. Secretary-General have rejected efforts to bypass the Security Council.

Westhawaiitoday details the still-unsigned draft resolution and the unresolved legal questions about how the board would operate.

More on USA