California Leads 20 States in Suing Trump to Block $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee

California Attorney General Rob Bonta is leading a coalition of 20 states in a federal lawsuit seeking to block President Donald Trump's September order that imposes a $100,000 fee on employers seeking new H-1B visas.

“California and a conjugation of different states are suing the Trump management complete a argumentation charging employers $100,000 for each caller H-1B visa they petition for overseas labor to activity successful the U”

Beritaja

The states argue the proclamation represents a dramatic and unlawful departure from established fees — described in coverage as a jump from the typical $2,000–$5,000 (or $960–$7,595 in other reporting) range to $100,000 — and say the administration exceeded its authority in adopting the levy.

Beritaja

The complaint frames the fee as unrelated to processing costs and an attempt to reshape the H-1B program without Congress.

A coalition frames the fee as an existential threat to public institutions and industries that rely on specialized foreign workers, warning it would devastate critical services, particularly education and health care, by pricing out schools, hospitals, and nonprofits.

Reporting quantifies the potential impact: plaintiffs cite roughly 30,000 educators and about 17,000 health-care workers who hold H-1Bs and warn that universities, research institutions, and innovation could suffer if hiring is chilled.

Business Insider

State officials argue that institutions cannot absorb such costs and warn the fee could be selectively enforced against certain employers.

The complaint advances claims under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Constitution.

“A coalition of blue states is suing the Trump administration over its fee of $100,000 for H-1B Visas, several Democratic attorneys general announced on Friday”

CNN

States allege the administration failed to follow required notice-and-comment rulemaking and impact-analysis procedures and that the president lacks statutory authority to impose the levy.

Plaintiffs cite prior litigation holding that only Congress can change visa program structure and argue that fee-setting authority is limited to costs necessary to administer visa programs.

The suit joins separate challenges from business and civil-society coalitions, indicating a broad legal front against the policy.

The administration defends the proclamation as a lawful step to reform H-1B and to protect U.S. workers from alleged program abuses.

The White House and administration allies argue the action targets employers who 'replaced American workers, depressed wages, and discouraged U.S. students from STEM fields' and say it is a legitimate exercise of presidential authority to restrict entry.

Crypto Briefing

Supporters outside government frame the change as a needed realignment, while opponents stress selective enforcement risks and erosion of employer access to talent.

Coverage differs on political framing: some outlets underline the policy's support among parts of Trump's base and Big Tech's opposition, while others foreground the practical harms to public institutions.