Full Analysis Summary
Why I won't fabricate
I cannot produce a factual article that says 'Doctors place ex-Bangladesh PM Khaleda Zia on ventilator' because none of the provided source snippets mention Khaleda Zia, her health, or any medical action.
The two supplied snippets refer to unrelated topics: a Times of India editor's note that the full article text isn't present and asks which story to summarize, and a Financial Express piece about Aamir Khan's Dangal and its China surge.
Therefore, any claim about Khaleda Zia would be unsupported by the provided material, and I will not fabricate or assume details.
If you can provide reliable source material that directly reports on Khaleda Zia's health or medical treatment, I can summarize those facts accurately.
Coverage Differences
Missed information / Unique off-topic coverage
The Times of India (Asian) snippet does not contain the full article and explicitly asks which story to summarize, indicating missing content and no mention of Khaleda Zia. Financial Express (Other) covers Indian film box-office and names Dangal as the top grosser, with no reference to Bangladeshi politics or Khaleda Zia. These two sources therefore differ by topic and both omit any information about Khaleda Zia's condition.
Sources and claim assessment
Because the provided sources are unrelated, I can only offer a cautious summary of what is actually present.
The Times of India snippet indicates missing content and asks for clarification about which story to summarize, implying the notable absence of a full report on any medical developments for public figures.
Financial Express discusses Dangal's international box-office performance and its China surge, which is cultural and economic reporting rather than health or political news.
Therefore, there is no corroborating evidence in the supplied material to support the ventilator claim.
Coverage Differences
Tone / Narrative
The Times of India snippet adopts a procedural, editorial tone asking for the user's intended story, reflecting missing content; Financial Express takes an analytical tone on film earnings. Neither adopts an urgent medical or political tone that would be expected if reporting that a former prime minister was placed on a ventilator.
Limits on verifying health claims
I must explicitly state the limitation: I cannot verify or report the claim that doctors placed Khaleda Zia on a ventilator based on the supplied material.
If you want an accurate, sourced article, please provide the actual news articles or links that report on Khaleda Zia's health.
For example, links from Bangladeshi outlets, international agencies, or other reputable news organizations would be appropriate.
Without those sources, any narrative would be speculative and would violate the requirement to base the response strictly on the provided material.
Coverage Differences
Missed information / Request for sources
Neither The Times of India nor Financial Express includes reporting on Khaleda Zia; The Times of India explicitly notes the absence of full text while Financial Express focuses on cinema. Thus both miss the crucial information needed. The user-supplied claim is uncorroborated by these sources.
Steps to summarize sources
If you supply the specific articles (full text or links) on Khaleda Zia's health from relevant outlets, I will summarize them and identify differences across source types such as Bangladeshi, regional Asian, Western mainstream, and alternative.
If you prefer, I can search for up-to-date reporting, but I can only summarize sources you provide here.
Until you provide those sources, I will not create an article asserting medical facts about Khaleda Zia that are unsupported by the provided documents.
Please provide the reformatted version with the specified structure.
Coverage Differences
Guidance / Offer of next actions
This paragraph is an instruction and not a report; it reflects the assistant's constraints and offers remedies. It is not present in either The Times of India or Financial Express snippets, which are news/editorial fragments, so it is unique to this response.