Ethereum Foundation Publishes Policy Guide Positioning Ethereum as Neutral Public Infrastructure for Governments

The Ethereum Foundation has published a new policy guide, “Ethereum for Governments and Institutions,” positioning Ethereum as neutral public infrastructure for governments and institutions rather than a speculative asset.

“Tipos de criptomonedas: los puntos básicos Criptomonedas de pago Por qué son una buena inversión Criptomonedas estables (stablecoins) Por qué son una buena inversión Criptomonedas de Capa 1 y Capa 2 Por qué son una buena inversión Criptomonedas DeFi (Finanzas Descentralizadas) Por qué son una buena inversión Criptomonedas de Wallet de criptomonedas Por qué son una buena inversión Criptomonedas DePIN (de infraestructura) Por qué son una buena inversión Criptomonedas de RWA (activos del mundo real) Por qué son una buena inversión Criptomonedas de gobierno Por qué son una buena inversión Criptomonedas de entretenimiento y GameFi Por qué son una buena inversión Criptomonedas de tipo meme Por qué son una buena inversión Criptomonedas CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currencies) Por qué son una buena inversión Criptomonedas Inteligencia Artificial Por qué son una buena inversión Tipos de criptomonedas vs Tokens Tokens no fungibles (NFTs) ¿Dónde comprar criptomonedas”

99Bitcoins

CoinDesk says the guide is a non-technical report aimed at policymakers and institutional decision-makers evaluating blockchain infrastructure, and it argues Ethereum’s decentralized design makes it suitable for “sovereign digital systems.”

@coindesk

The foundation’s Global Policy Strategy (GPS) team also frames today’s digital services—payments, identity systems, registries, and file management—as relying on centralized intermediaries that create “operational and governance risks.”

In support of that case, the guide highlights Ethereum’s technical track record, including that the network has maintained uninterrupted uptime since its launch in 2015, and it cites an OpenZeppelin report on security metrics.

Bitget reports that the Ethereum Foundation argues decentralized systems offer a more resilient foundation for “identity verification and public record management than traditional centralized institutions.”

In that same policy framing, Bitget says the foundation highlighted that Ethereum has not experienced a single interruption since its launch in 2015, contrasting it with frequent outages and cyberattacks affecting centralized government and financial databases.

DiarioBitcoin

The foundation also points to economic security, with Bitget stating the network is backed by approximately $76 billion in staked assets, making attacks “prohibitively expensive.”

CoinDesk adds that the report cites OpenZeppelin and says Ethereum was secured by roughly $76 billion worth of staked ETH as of March 2026, while emphasizing the geographically distributed validator network and multiple independent client implementations.

The policy guide points to government experimentation already underway, with Bitget naming Bhutan, Buenos Aires, and select jurisdictions in India as testing Ethereum-based solutions for public services.

“The Ethereum Foundation has formally positioned its blockchain network as neutral public infrastructure, arguing that decentralized systems offer a more resilient foundation for identity verification and public record management than traditional centralized institutions”

Bitget

CoinDesk similarly says the report points to existing implementations, including decentralized identity initiatives in Bhutan and Buenos Aires and Ethereum-based land registry projects in India, as examples of governments experimenting with the technology.

The foundation’s guidance also urges policymakers to distinguish between decentralized public blockchains and networks controlled by corporations or foundations, arguing that governance structures will determine which platforms are suitable for long-term public sector use.

TradingView frames the foundation’s thesis as a push for sovereign digital systems, saying the document “is intended as a non-technical manual for officials evaluating blockchain,” and it emphasizes that “open, ownerless” protocols are presented as digital public infrastructure rather than a mere financial network.