European Commission Prepares Circular Economy Act Aiming To Double EU Circularity Rate By 2030
Image: Xpert.Digital

European Commission Prepares Circular Economy Act Aiming To Double EU Circularity Rate By 2030

24 June, 2026.Technology and Science.9 sources

Key Takeaways

  • EU circular economy legislation to be presented by end-2026 after public consultation.
  • Autumn 2026 adoption by the Commission of the new circular economy rules.
  • Aims to consolidate and strengthen the circular transition across all sectors of the EU economy.

Circular Economy Act Looms

The European Commission is preparing a Circular Economy Act, a future law framework for the entire European Union, with a proposal scheduled for “a fine 2026” after a public consultation “aperta tra agosto e novembre 2026.”

Energy, Transport, Circular Economy: the 5th Ddadue bill moves past the Senate stage The Senate adopted, in first reading, on February 18, the bill bearing various provisions for adaptation to EU law

Banque des TerritoiresBanque des Territoires

The plan aims to double by 2030 the current European circularity rate, which is described as “praticamente fermo da anni intorno al 12%,” and to do so by incentivizing “recupero, riciclo e riuso.”

Image from Banque des Territoires
Banque des TerritoiresBanque des Territoires

The act is positioned as a response to fragmentation in existing circular policies, building on the Clean Industrial Deal and the 2015 action plan for the circular economy updated with a new plan in March 2020.

It also sets out a goal of creating a “mercato unico per le materie prime secondarie e prodotti circolari,” intended to reduce dependence on strategic raw materials by expanding the use of recovered, recycled, or reused materials.

The sectors highlighted for involvement include electronics, batteries, packaging, plastics, textiles, construction, food, water, and nutrients, with waste treated as a resource to be kept in circulation.

EPR Meets Simplification Fight

On 24 June, the Council agreed its negotiating position on parts of an environmental simplification package covering industrial emissions, circular-economy rules and geospatial data, but it discontinued negotiations on two proposals relating to extended producer responsibility after “strong reservations from a large majority of member states.”

The EU Today account describes EPR as a system under which “producers are made responsible for the collection, treatment or financing of waste from products they place on the market,” and notes that the principle is already embedded in rules for packaging, batteries, electrical equipment, single-use plastics and textiles.

Image from Climate Home News
Climate Home NewsClimate Home News

One Commission change described by EU Today would have suspended rules requiring certain producers selling goods into another member state to appoint an authorised representative for EPR compliance, a move supporters framed as reducing administrative costs for cross-border operators.

Opponents warned that weakening authorised-representative requirements could make enforcement harder, because without a clear local compliance contact “national authorities may struggle to trace responsibility for waste obligations.”

Recycling Europe argues that the underlying EPR economics are also failing recyclers, saying Article 8a of the Waste Framework Directive requires producers to bear at least 80% of the “necessary costs,” but that the law never defines what those costs include.

From Rules to Investment

la Repubblica says the act is designed to consolidate and strengthen the circular transition across all sectors, with a focus on harmonizing criteria and procedures so businesses and investors can operate at a European scale.

Among the tools described are a revision of end-of-waste rules, tighter criteria for traceability and recycling of electrical and electronic products, and harmonized rules on extended producer responsibility to stimulate demand for circular goods.

The article also points to digitization of waste management procedures, stating that the full transition to electronic systems for traceability of cross-border shipments is scheduled for May 21, 2026.

In parallel, Recycling Europe’s critique highlights how the Circular Economy Act could change procurement and sustainability teams’ decisions if “necessary costs” definitions are broadened, because that could raise EPR fees and affect supplier economics and the reliability of recycled-material supply.

More on Technology and Science