Federal Appeals Court Lets Trump Administration Expand Fast-Track Deportations Nationwide
Image: TRT Français

Federal Appeals Court Lets Trump Administration Expand Fast-Track Deportations Nationwide

23 June, 2026.USA.15 sources

Key Takeaways

  • DC Circuit panel reverses lower court, allows nationwide expansion of expedited removal.
  • Ruling grants DHS/ICE authority to broaden fast-track deportations across the United States.
  • Court decision boosts the Trump administration's expedited removal policy nationwide.

Nationwide expedited removal

A federal appeals court on Tuesday allowed the Trump administration to move forward with an effort to expand fast-track deportations throughout the U.S., in a legal win for the president's crackdown on illegal immigration.

A United States court of appeals has said that the administration of President Donald Trump can proceed with a process to fast-track the deportation of immigrants living in the country

Al JazeeraAl Jazeera

The 2-1 decision by a panel of judges at the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Columbia Circuit allows the Department of Homeland Security to carry out an expansion of the expedited removal process, which empowers federal immigration officials to deport some detainees without court hearings.

Image from Al Jazeera
Al JazeeraAl Jazeera

Before the second Trump administration, the expedited removal policy was limited to areas close to the border and only applied to recent entrants who could not prove they had been living in the country for more than two weeks, but the policy allowed to take effect Tuesday expands expedited removal to anywhere in the United States.

Officials can use it on any unauthorized immigrant who cannot prove they have been in the country for more than two years, and the policy allowed to take effect Tuesday was in the first week of President Trump's second term in January 2025.

In August 2025, a federal judge found the Trump administration's expansion of expedited removal after a lawsuit from immigrant advocacy group Make the Road New York, but the appellate judges disagreed Tuesday and invalidated her order.

Due process fight

In the majority opinion, Trump-appointed Justin Walker and Neomi Rao said the expedited-removal process offers sufficient due process protections, writing that "Make the Road has not shown that the expedited-removal process denies its members notice and an opportunity to be heard."

Obama-appointed Circuit Judge Robert Wilkins dissented, arguing the policy deprives people of due process rights, and he wrote that "Absent such knowledge, the noncitizen is simply left to hope that the immigration officer will conclude" they met the two-years rule.

Image from BFM
BFMBFM

James Percival, the top lawyer at DHS, said Tuesday's order "vindicated our decision to apply the law as written," and he added, "It's not too late to take a $2,600 check and a free flight home!"

The Los Angeles Times described the same Tuesday ruling as overturning a lower-court halt and warned that civil rights advocates and a President Biden-appointed district judge said the expanded program risks wrongful deportations and weak due process safeguards.

The Hill reported that the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a 2-1 ruling overturning a lower-court decision blocking the efforts last year, and it quoted Walker that due process requires an opportunity to be heard "at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner."

What happens next

The ruling immediately revives the Trump administration’s move to speed up deportations of undocumented immigrants in the United States, allowing immigration authorities to remove an individual from the country without a hearing before an immigration judge.

A federal appeals court on Tuesday allowed the Trump administration to move forward with an effort to expand fast-track deportations throughout the U

CBS NewsCBS News

CNN said the decision allows the administration to move forward with its plan to quickly deport undocumented immigrants who are residing in the United States and can’t prove they’ve lived in the country continuously for two years or more.

In the same reporting, CNN described that a trial court had previously blocked the administration’s January 21, 2025, maneuver to expand the policy beyond just migrants apprehended within 100 miles of a land border and within 14 days of arrival.

The Le Monde report added that Judge Jia Cobb had blocked the expedited removal procedure on August 29, invoking the Constitution’s guarantee that "no one shall be expelled from the United States without the opportunity, at some point, to be heard."

In Mexico, Erick Flores, a 56-year-old Mexican in the Chalco valley, said he was deported from the United States on November 7, 2025, and told Le Monde that "When I arrived, I did not recognize anything. The city has changed a lot in twenty years!"

More on USA