Former Arizona Supreme Court Justice Andrew Gould Says Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos Compromised Nancy Guthrie Case, Urges Resignation and FBI Takeover

Former Arizona Supreme Court Justice Andrew Gould publicly urged Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos to resign and for the FBI to take over the investigation into the Feb. 1 disappearance of Nancy Guthrie.

“Investigators say the home doorbell camera disconnected at 1:47 a”

101.5 KGB

Gould said Nanos had "made some mistakes" that impeded the case and that the sheriff "is becoming more of the story than the investigation," remarks Gould made on Fox News Live amid reporting of friction between the sheriff’s office and federal agents.

101.5 KGB

Fox reports and other outlets have covered allegations that FBI leaders wanted DNA and other evidence sent to their Quantico lab while items were allegedly directed to a private Florida laboratory.

Nanos denied that claim, calling it "not even close to the truth."

Gould said he supports deputies’ on-the-ground work but believes the sheriff should step aside so the FBI can preserve prosecution options.

There is no public word yet on whether Nanos will resign as searches and follow-up work continue.

The broader investigation features multi‑agency activity and no public arrests so far.

Law enforcement has executed court-authorized searches, sealed roads about two miles from Guthrie’s home, and towed a gray Range Rover.

7NEWS

Authorities have briefly detained individuals in connection with search warrants and traffic stops, though several outlets report conflicting counts of how many people were held.

The FBI has logged more than 13,000 tips and the sheriff’s office tens of thousands of calls.

Officials and the family have released surveillance stills showing a masked man carrying a 25‑liter Ozark Trail pack and described a suspect roughly 5'9"–5'10" of average build.

Authorities have said blood matching Guthrie was found on the porch and that investigators recovered gloves and other items across a roughly two‑mile search area.

A central forensic development reported across many outlets is a glove recovered roughly two miles from Guthrie’s home that the FBI says "appears to match" gloves worn by the masked person seen on doorbell video.

“Headline: Public electric car charging cables were cut and stolen at a shopping centre”

9News.au

A preliminary DNA profile from that glove was reportedly returned after testing at a private Florida lab and is undergoing quality control before any entry into national databases.

Coverage converges on the glove’s existence, the preliminary DNA work and pending confirmation, but outlets differ in tone: some use cautious qualifiers about visual or preliminary matches while others frame it as a potentially pivotal lead.

Coverage diverges on emphasis and framing.

Hindustan Times and outlets citing Gould's Fox News Live remarks highlight his call for Nanos to step aside.

AP News

Mainstream U.S. outlets including CNN, AP and NBC balance that criticism with warnings that intense media attention and public debate over evidence handling can complicate prosecutorial options.

Tabloid and local outlets provide more vivid on-scene detail and speculative reporting on detentions and dramatic operations.

Many mainstream reports stress that no arrests have been made and key forensic steps remain unconfirmed.

At this stage the record across outlets is clear about several facts and clear about several uncertainties: multiple agencies are engaged, doorbell surveillance images of a masked person have been released, investigators recovered gloves and an unknown DNA profile that does not match Guthrie or known close contacts, and no arrests have been announced.

“Law enforcement has dramatically expanded the investigation into the disappearance of Guthrie: the Pima County Sheriff’s Department and the FBI have assigned several hundred detectives and agents and are combing the property for clues”

Associated Press

Where reporting diverges — the exact chain of custody and lab choices for evidence, the count and status of those briefly detained, and how definitively to describe the glove/DNA as a match — the articles either report allegations, publish denials, or add cautious qualifiers.

Associated Press

Those discrepancies are factual and sourced within the coverage; they leave the public with unresolved questions the FBI and Pima County investigators say they are still trying to answer.