Full Analysis Summary
England's SEND reforms
The government has published a Schools White Paper described by LabourList as 'Every child achieving and thriving'.
It sets out major reforms to England’s special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) system, introducing statutory Individual Support Plans (ISPs) and planning a long transition away from the current Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) model over the next decade.
Perspective Media reports the package is backed by £4 billion and frames the changes as moving SEND pupils 'from sidelined and excluded to seen, heard and included'.
The BBC describes the reforms as a decade‑long transition with school‑led ISPs and says ministers stress more money will be spent on SEND.
ITVX and The i Paper summarise the main shift as keeping EHCPs for the most complex cases while introducing ISPs for others.
They forecast EHCP numbers to peak around 2029/30 before falling to about 4.7% by 2034/35.
Coverage Differences
Tone
Some mainstream outlets emphasise the government’s framing of the reforms as inclusive and well‑funded (Perspective Media, ITVX), while others stress the length and upheaval of the transition and ministerial reassurances amid parental alarm (BBC). LabourList frames the White Paper as a progressive reorganisation under the title “Every child achieving and thriving.” Each source reports different emphases: official framing (quotes from ministers), projected numbers, and the length of the transition.
Educational support reforms
The White Paper establishes a multi‑tiered support structure: universal, targeted, targeted‑plus (mainstream) and Special Provision Plans (SPPs) for the most complex needs, while ISPs become the statutory school‑led plans for those outside the highest tier.
The i Paper describes a four‑tier system to be implemented from 2029 with phased transitions through 2035.
Perspective Media and ITVX say ISPs will have statutory footing and will not require a formal diagnosis.
Officials and multiple outlets note the DfE projects EHCP numbers to peak around 2029/30 and then fall.
They add that reassessments and transfers from EHCPs to ISPs are expected between about 2030 and 2035.
Coverage Differences
Detail
Sources align on the tiered structure and that ISPs do not require formal diagnoses, but they differ on specificity about tiers and labels. The i Paper labels the highest level special provision 'SPPs' and calls ISPs digital “passports,” while Perspective Media emphasises ISPs' statutory footing and reassessment protections. ITVX provides the same numerical projection for EHCP shares but also notes the White Paper’s delay for further testing.
White Paper funding breakdown
The White Paper is backed by a multi‑billion pound package.
Perspective Media and LabourList state the reforms are backed by £4 billion.
ITVX and Nursery World report this includes a £1.6bn inclusive mainstream fund over three years and £1.8bn for an 'experts at hand' service to bring specialists into local areas.
Tes reports a related commitment of £3.7bn for new specialist places in mainstream and special schools and notes additional smaller investments such as £15m for an evidence base.
These differing figures reflect how outlets break down or focus on specific line items within the overall package, and the sources' numbers are not identical.
The BBC also highlights a fiscal context, reporting that the government plans to take on SEND costs from councils from 2028, which it says adds further pressure.
Coverage Differences
Numbers
Sources use different figures or emphasise different parts of the funding package. Perspective Media and LabourList use a headline '£4 billion', ITVX and Nursery World itemise £1.6bn and £1.8bn components, while Tes highlights a £3.7bn commitment specifically for specialist places — showing variation in what each outlet foregrounds when reporting funding.
Responses to SEND reforms
Responses in the coverage are mixed and emphasise concerns about reassessment, accountability and whether the funding will reach front‑line early years and school staff.
The BBC reports many parents and opposition figures are alarmed by reassessments and worry about losing legal protections tied to EHCPs.
Nursery World quotes early years leaders welcoming early identification but warning that rhetoric must be matched by sustained investment and urging that funding reaches early years professionals.
Teaching unions flagged resources were insufficient.
ITVX cites NASUWT and NEU warnings, and Nursery World quotes NEU general secretary Daniel Kebede calling the Inclusion Grant too small.
LabourList frames the reforms against a background where EHCP numbers and SEND costs have risen sharply, citing the NAO’s warning of financial unsustainability.
Coverage Differences
Tone
Coverage varies from cautious endorsement of the White Paper’s ambition (Perspective Media and some sector responses) to explicit alarm from parents, unions and some commentators (BBC, ITVX, Nursery World). LabourList emphasises systemic drivers like rising EHCP numbers and financial strain (quotes NAO and DfE figures), while individual outlets highlight particular stakeholder perspectives (unions, early years leaders).
Coverage of SEND reforms
Reporting shows clear differences in detail on accountability, placement and legal rights.
Tes outlines changes to tribunal powers, saying parents will still be able to appeal EHCP decisions but tribunals will no longer be able to name a specific school or placement and parents cannot appeal the content of ISPs at tribunal.
The i Paper says the reforms aim to resolve the “vast majority” of SEND disputes via independent mediation with tribunals as a backstop.
Perspective Media, ITVX and LabourList emphasise transitional protections for children already on EHCPs, giving examples such as children in Year 3+ keeping EHCPs until at least 16 and reassessment timing around secondary transfer.
Tes and The i Paper add proposed national inclusion standards, digital systems and independent expert panels to strengthen oversight.
Coverage Differences
Policy detail
Outlets diverge on what legal routes remain and how disputes will be handled. Tes explicitly reports limits on tribunal powers and non‑appealability of ISP content, The i Paper highlights a stronger mediation approach, while mainstream outlets like Perspective Media and ITVX foreground transitional protections and ministerial assurances — meaning the practical rights and redress available to families are reported differently across sources.