Full story
How Emily Hart Was Built
An AI-generated MAGA influencer known online as “Emily Hart” was created by a 22-year-old man in India who used generative AI tools to design the persona’s face, body, captions, and lifestyle posts.
“The MAGA influencer was widely known online as "Emily Hart"”
Multiple outlets describe the character as a blonde “MAGA influencer” who supported US President Donald Trump, posed in bikinis, and posted content that included Christianity, gun rights, and anti-abortion and anti-immigration messaging.
NDTV says the creator, “Sam,” used Google’s AI Gemini to help make the account successful, and that the AI suggested targeting “a specific audience such as conservative (MAGA) audiences, especially older men in the US.”
WIRED, as quoted by several publications, reports that Sam created Emily Hart “last January,” using Google Gemini’s Nano Banana Pro, and that the chatbot selected the “MAGA/conservative niche” as a “cheat code.”
The account’s content included posts like “If you want a reason to unfollow: Christ is king, abortion is murder, and all illegals must be deported” and “POV: You were assigned intelligent at birth, but you identify as liberal <clown emoji>.”
WIRED also says Sam posted on Instagram under the handle “@emily_hart.nurse,” and that he used AI-generated images of Hart doing activities such as ice fishing, drinking Coors Light, and shooting at a rifle range.
NDTV adds that the influencer was “widely known online as ‘Emily Hart’” and that the creator told reporters she looked like Hollywood actress Jennifer Lawrence, while the profile claimed she was a nurse.
The Monetization Machine
As the Emily Hart account grew, outlets say Sam monetized the attention through subscriptions and merchandise, while also using additional AI tools to generate more explicit content.
WIRED reports that “Within a month, Emily Hart had more than 10,000 Instagram followers,” and that “many of whom also subscribed to her softcore AI-generated content on the OnlyFans competitor Fanvue.”
WIRED further says Sam sold “MAGA-themed T-shirts” and that he “estimates he was making a few thousand dollars a month,” while also describing the time investment as “I was spending maybe 30 to 50 minutes of my day, and I was making good money for a medical student.”
The New York Post similarly states that Sam “cashed in on the AI model’s appeal — selling MAGA-themed T-shirts and creating an account on the OnlyFans competitor Fanvue,” and it quotes Sam saying “I was spending maybe 30 to 50 minutes of my day, and I was making good money for a medical student.”
NDTV says Sam used X’s Grok AI to create more explicit images of the fake influencer and uploaded them to Fanvue, where “people pay to see exclusive photos and interact with creators.”
The Times of India, citing WIRED, reports that Sam monetised the account through “merchandise sales and subscription-based platforms such as Fanvue,” and that “Paid subscribers were reportedly given access to exclusive material, including AI-generated images and adult-themed content.”
WIRED states “Every Reel I posted was getting 3 million views, 5 million views, 10 million views,” and NDTV says “Every reel I posted was getting 3 million views, 5 million views, 10 million views.”
AI Guidance and the “Cheat Code”
A central element across the reporting is that Sam sought advice from Google’s Gemini AI on how to make the influencer account successful, and that the chatbot steered him toward a political niche.
“If you create a generic ‘hot girl,’ you’re competing with a million other models”
WIRED says Sam turned to Gemini after his early attempts with “generic photos of a beautiful, scantily clad woman” did not “hit,” and it quotes a Gemini transcript in which it warned: “If you create a generic ‘hot girl,’ you’re competing with a million other models.”
WIRED then reports that Sam presented Gemini with options and that the chatbot selected the “MAGA/conservative niche,” calling it a “cheat code,” and adding that “the conservative audience (especially older men in the US) often has higher disposable income and is more loyal.”
NDTV similarly describes Gemini’s suggestion, saying the AI recommended targeting “a specific audience such as conservative (MAGA) audiences, especially older men in the US, who are often more loyal followers and have more money to spend.”
WIRED includes a response from a Gemini representative, stating: “Gemini is designed not to give a particular opinion unless you tell it to. Instead, it is designed to offer neutral responses that don't favor any political ideology or viewpoint.”
The Daily Beast adds a similar dispute, quoting a Gemini spokesperson: “Gemini is designed to answer your requests without conveying a particular set of beliefs, and if asked for its opinion, it should provide a range of viewpoints.”
In the reporting, Sam’s own account of his daily posting strategy is tied to the niche guidance, with WIRED saying “Every day I’d write something pro-Christian, pro-Second Amendment, pro-life, anti-abortion, anti-woke, and anti-immigration.”
Platform Enforcement and Removal
The reporting also describes how platform enforcement and disclosure rules intersected with the scam, including the timeline of takedowns and the role of AI labeling requirements.
WIRED says that “Though many social media platforms, including Instagram, require creators to disclose if their content is AI-generated, such guidelines are enforced only in a slapdash fashion,” and it adds that “Emily’s posts were not labeled as AI-generated.”
India TodayNDTV says Hart’s Instagram profile was “taken down in February for fraudulent activity,” and it adds that after WIRED exposed the scheme, “her Facebook account was also removed.”
The New York Post similarly says “Hart’s profile on Instagram — which requires creators to disclose whether their content is AI-generated —was taken down by the platform in February for ‘fraudulent’ activity,” and it adds that “A Facebook account that Wired said remained online has been taken down since the article was published.”
The Times of India reports that “the Instagram account was taken down in February for ‘fraudulent’ activity,” and that “A related Facebook account was also removed following publication of the investigation.”
The Daily Beast says “The account was eventually banned for 'fraudulent' activity. The Facebook page remains,” while Metro.co.uk says “Jessica and Emily’s accounts appear to have been taken down by Instagram, as they violate the rules for not disclosing AI-generated media.”
Across the accounts, the takedown is tied to the platform’s AI disclosure and fraud rules, while Sam’s own position is that he did not view himself as scamming, with WIRED quoting him: “I don’t feel like I was scamming people.”
Reactions and Wider Implications
Beyond the individual case, outlets connect the Emily Hart scheme to broader concerns about AI-generated personas and their believability, as well as the political targeting that made the account effective.
“AI has made them [fake profiles] more believable, and there has perhaps been an amplification of it.”
WIRED quotes Valerie Wirtschafter, a fellow at the Brookings Institution studying emerging tech and democracy, saying “AI has made them [fake profiles] more believable, and there has perhaps been an amplification of it.”
WIRED also says that young MAGA women are “more attention-grabbing,” and it ties that to the claim that “18- to 29-year-old women overwhelmingly skew liberal,” which it says helps explain why the “MAGA” framing could spread quickly.
Ars Technica and the Indian Express both describe the concern that AI-generated personas are becoming increasingly realistic and raise issues of “misinformation, authenticity, and their impact on social media ecosystems and political engagement,” as attributed to “Experts cited in the report.”
The Indian Express states that Sam “maintains he doesn’t regret creating the persona,” quoting him: “I don’t feel like I was scamming people,” and it says he “plans to focus on his medical studies instead.”
NDTV reports that the influencer was “widely known online as ‘Emily Hart’” and that the persona was designed to appeal to conservative audiences, including older men, which the reporting ties to the monetization strategy.
WIRED’s framing of the broader trend is that Emily Hart is “one of a slew of AI-generated hot girl MAGA influencers,” and it describes a recurring template of “white and blonde” personas with jobs as “emergency responders.”
