Full story
ICJ Dismisses Sudan's Genocide Suit
The ICJ dismissed Sudan's lawsuit accusing the UAE of complicity in genocide in Darfur.
“The International Court of Justice in The Hague rejected a suit filed by Sudan against the United Arab Emirates”
The court voted 14 to 2 to reject Sudan's request for provisional measures and 9 to 7 to strike the case from its list.
The UAE welcomed the decision as a clear and decisive affirmation that the case was utterly baseless.
Sudan's Minister of Culture and Information vowed to knock on every door.
The ruling came amid a two-year civil war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced at least 13 million people.
UAE's Reservation Blocks ICJ
The ICJ's dismissal was based on the UAE's reservation to Article IX of the Genocide Convention.
The court acknowledged it was deeply concerned about the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan.
The Raoul Wallenberg Centre called the decision a travesty.
16 states have inserted blanket reservations including the UAE.
The UK has argued such broad reservations may be incompatible with the convention.
Divergent Death Toll Estimates
The death toll from the war in Sudan remains disputed.
“A UN panel of experts report published no evidence that the UAE was arming the RSF”
The UN panel found no evidence the UAE was arming the RSF.
The ICJ ruling was based solely on jurisdictional grounds.
The Raoul Wallenberg Centre warned that to be silent now is to be complicit.
About 25 million people are facing severe hunger.
Legal and Political Implications
The ICJ's decision has sparked debate over the use of reservations.
Some judges were willing to reconsider ICJ case-law on reservations.
Sudan's case highlighted challenges of applying the Genocide Convention's categories.
Previous bodies investigating Darfur had reinforced processes of racialization.
The UAE called for an unconditional end to the war.