Full Analysis Summary
Sources lack claim support
I cannot find any of the provided source texts reporting that Iran condemned a United States attack on Venezuela.
The two supplied snippets do not mention an attack on Venezuela by the United States.
One source (ایران اینترنشنال) reports Tehran’s designation of Canada’s navy and other regional reactions.
The other source (PressTV) contains no article text and only an instruction to "click the share button."
Because neither source addresses a United States attack on Venezuela, I cannot accurately write a sourced article asserting that Iran condemned such an attack without additional material.
Coverage Differences
Missed information / Unique/off-topic
ایران اینترنشنال (West Asian) contains detailed reporting about Iran’s diplomatic responses (for example, designating Canada’s navy) and regional positions but does not mention any U.S. attack on Venezuela. PressTV (West Asian) in the supplied snippet provides no substantive news coverage at all—only an interface instruction—so it cannot confirm or deny the alleged event. Thus, the two sources either miss the specific claim entirely (ایران اینترنشنال) or are off-topic/non-substantive (PressTV).
Iran's reciprocal responses
Available reporting shows Tehran responding strongly to moves it views as hostile by other states.
ایران اینترنشنال reports that Iran designated Canada’s navy a 'terrorist organization' as direct retaliation for Ottawa’s earlier designation of the IRGC, framing the move as reciprocal and a rebuke to what Tehran called an unlawful branding of a state armed force.
That context indicates Iran uses formal diplomatic and legal counters against foreign actions it views as hostile, but the provided snippets do not extend that pattern to an incident involving Venezuela and the United States.
Coverage Differences
Narrative / Tone
ایران اینترنشنال (West Asian) reports Tehran’s actions with explicit language about retaliation and reciprocity, quoting Iranian framing that Canada 'unlawfully branded' an official armed force and thus 'warranted a reciprocal response.' PressTV (West Asian), by contrast, supplies no reporting to convey any tone on this or related matters—so its absence is notable and creates an asymmetry in coverage among the supplied sources.
Iran's regional diplomacy
The Iran-related material in ایران اینترنشنال highlights Tehran’s broader regional diplomacy and alignments reported in the snippet.
The piece quotes Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov praising Iran’s restraint after reported joint Israeli‑U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear-linked sites, calling those strikes violations of international law and warning of regional volatility.
It reports Iran joining roughly 20 Arab and Islamic countries, the OIC, and Syria to denounce Israel’s recognition of Somaliland as a violation of Somalia’s sovereignty.
These items illustrate the kinds of international criticisms and alliances Iran engages in, but they do not mention Venezuela or a U.S. attack on it.
Coverage Differences
Narrative / Coverage focus
ایران اینترنشنال (West Asian) covers Iran’s regional diplomacy and alliances (including quoting external voices like Russia’s Lavrov) and Iran’s denunciations of other states’ actions (e.g., Israel’s Somaliland recognition). PressTV (West Asian) supplies no substantive coverage in the snippet, which means the supplied corpus lacks alternative perspectives (e.g., a Western mainstream or Western alternative account) to compare tone or framing across source types.
Source limitations
Conclusion: based solely on the supplied source texts, I cannot produce a factual, sourced 4–6 paragraph article stating that 'Iran Condemns United States' Attack on Venezuela' because the provided articles do not mention such an event.
The available material shows examples of Iran condemning or retaliating against other states (for example, Canada’s navy designation and denouncing Israel’s Somaliland recognition) and quotes foreign officials on related regional incidents, but none reference Venezuela or a U.S. attack on it.
If you can provide the specific article(s) or additional sources that report Iran's condemnation of a U.S. attack on Venezuela, I will produce the requested 4–6 paragraph article and highlight differences across source types.
Coverage Differences
Ambiguity / Missing evidence
No supplied source mentions a U.S. attack on Venezuela; therefore any assertion that Tehran condemned such an attack would be unsupported by the given texts. The only substantive supplied source (ایران اینترنشنال) discusses other diplomatic conflicts and retaliations, while PressTV’s snippet is non-substantive, leaving the user with no evidence on the Venezuela claim.