Syria15 December, 20252 min read
ISIS Gunman Ambushes and Kills Two U.S. Soldiers, American Interpreter Near Palmyra, Syria
This article is an automated aggregation of coverage from news outlets. Our editorials offer in-depth analysis curated by the NewsCord team.
Islamic State gunman ambushed U.S. forces in the desert near Palmyra, Syria Sgt. Edgar Brian Torres-Tovar and Sgt. William Nathaniel Howard, Iowa National Guard, were killed
15 outlets told this the same way.
Outlets did split on France Suspends Police Stun Grenades at High School Protests After 15-Year-Old Loses Hand →
Palmyra ambush, U.S. response
An ambush near the Syrian desert town of Palmyra in Homs province on Dec. 13, 2025, killed two U.S. Army soldiers and an American civilian interpreter and wounded three others, U.S. officials said, prompting an active investigation and vows of retaliation.
“Two U.S. Army soldiers and an American civilian interpreter were killed and three others wounded Saturday in an attack near Palmyra, Syria, the Pentagon announced.”
The Pentagon described the mission as a 'key leader engagement' supporting counter-ISIS and counter-terrorism operations, and CENTCOM characterized the attacker as a lone ISIS gunman who fired from a nearby building and was killed by partner forces.
President Trump and U.S. officials vowed a response, while U.S. spokesmen withheld names pending next-of-kin notifications.
Iowa Guard Fatalities Coverage
U.S. officials identified the fallen as members of an Iowa National Guard contingent, naming Sgt. Edgar Brian Torres Tovar and Sgt. William Nathaniel Howard, and local and national outlets emphasized the human cost and community impact.
CNN, Fox News, and local reporting detailed the soldiers' service and family reactions, with Fox profiling one soldier's background and hometown ties.
State officials also confirmed the Iowa National Guard assignment for the unit supporting Operation Inherent Resolve, while the Pentagon continued to withhold some details pending notifications.
Divergent attack accounts
Accounts diverge over how and where the shooter struck. U.S. officials described the attack as occurring while troops were meeting with local partners or providing security outside, and said they were fired upon from a nearby building.
“U.S. soldiers and their interpreter were providing security outside when a lone gunman opened fire from a nearby building with what appeared to be a machine gun.”
Syrian sources say the attacker had been embedded in or recently recruited into Syrian security units and either infiltrated a meeting or attacked a joint patrol. Several sources report that Syrian security forces returned fire and killed the attacker, and that Syrian authorities had warned coalition partners beforehand about risks of Islamic State infiltration.
Responses to ISIS attack
The attack triggered immediate operational and political responses. Syrian authorities reported arrests and launched a joint security campaign to hunt ISIS sleeper cells across the desert. President Trump promised "very serious retaliation," and U.S. politicians and diplomats responded with calls ranging from retaliation to withdrawal.
Press TV highlighted Senator Rand Paul's renewed calls for full U.S. troop withdrawal from Syria, arguing the U.S. presence acts as a "trip wire." Türkiye Today quoted the U.S. envoy promising the attack "will not be left unanswered." Harici and regional outlets described follow-on sweeps by Syrian and HTS-backed units and arrests of suspects.
Conflicting reports on attack
Significant factual uncertainties remain. Sources disagree on whether the attacker was an external ISIS operative or a Syrian security member with extremist sympathies. They also disagree on whether the shooting occurred at a formal joint meeting or outside during security duties.
“The incident is under active investigation, and The New York Times, citing Syrian state media, reported U.S. and Syrian forces came under attack during a joint patrol in the area.”
There is disagreement over the degree to which coalition warnings had been issued beforehand. Multiple outlets report arrests and follow-up operations but emphasize that investigations are ongoing. Readers should treat contested claims cautiously because reporting reflects differing national perspectives and official narratives.
