Full Analysis Summary
Source verification summary
I cannot confirm or detail an incident titled “Israel Kills Three Palestinians in Gaza” based on the two provided sources.
Neither the South China Morning Post nor Macau Business mention any events in Gaza or that Israel killed three Palestinians; the available snippets instead cover a drone strike in North Darfur and a range of unrelated headlines and briefs.
Because the requested event is not present in the supplied materials, I must refrain from inventing details and note the absence of coverage in these sources.
Coverage Differences
Missed information / omission
South China Morning Post (Asian) reports on a drone strike in Malha, North Darfur and evacuation of aid workers from Kadugli but does not mention Gaza or Israeli actions. Macau Business (Other) provides brief headlines about diplomatic talks, Ukraine fighting, Macau law reforms, Cambodia displacement and other domestic items; it likewise does not report the Gaza incident. Both sources therefore omit the event the user asked about, meaning there is no confirmation of "Israel kills three Palestinians in Gaza" within these materials.
North Darfur drone strike
The South China Morning Post snippet focuses on a deadly drone strike in Malha, North Darfur.
The report attributes ten deaths and heavy material damage to the strike and notes intensified fighting elsewhere in Sudan that prompted evacuations of aid workers from Kadugli.
The piece centers on Sudanese conflict dynamics and humanitarian impact rather than on Israeli–Palestinian events, quoting emergency volunteers while not identifying the attacker to reflect a cautious, sourcing-based approach.
Coverage Differences
Tone and focus
South China Morning Post (Asian) presents detailed local conflict reporting—specific casualties, locations (Malha, Kadugli), and sources (emergency volunteers)—and focuses on Sudan; Macau Business (Other) instead runs brief headline items about geopolitics, legal reforms, displacement in Southeast Asia and consumer commentary. The two sources therefore differ in geographic focus and reporting depth: SCMP provides a focused incident report, while Macau Business aggregates short briefs across varied topics.
Macau Business brief roundup
The Kremlin denies planned three-way talks on Ukraine.
Reports note fighting in Ukraine's Sumy region and alleged forced relocations of about 50 people.
A legal scholar suggests Macau's new Trust Law could serve as a model for Greater Bay Area harmonization.
Large displacement was reported after clashes on the Cambodia–Thailand border.
Macau outlines a tourism accessibility strategy.
A commentary warns that smartphones act as 'attentional' time sinks.
These are short, varied briefs rather than in-depth single-issue reporting.
Coverage Differences
Narrative breadth / unique/off-topic coverage
Macau Business (Other) offers a wide array of short, often locally-focused or policy-oriented briefs—from legal reform in Macau to displacement in Cambodia—that are not covered by South China Morning Post (Asian) in the provided snippets. SCMP concentrates on a single violent incident in Sudan. Thus Macau Business provides broader topical variety while SCMP gives concentrated conflict reporting.
Gaza claim verification
In sum, based solely on the supplied snippets, there is no coverage confirming that "Israel killed three Palestinians in Gaza."
The two sources instead cover unrelated international and regional stories.
SCMP reports an incident in Sudan while Macau Business provides varied briefs on diplomacy, law, displacement and local commentary.
Therefore, any reporting on Gaza would need to come from other sources.
I recommend consulting dedicated Middle East and Palestinian/Israeli news outlets or wire services for confirmation and details.
Within the provided materials, the Gaza claim is unverified and absent.
Coverage Differences
Conclusion / recommendation
Both sources omit the Gaza incident; South China Morning Post (Asian) focuses on Sudan, while Macau Business (Other) focuses on short, diverse briefs. This omission means neither source corroborates the user's event, and their differing emphases explain why the Gaza story is not present in these snippets.