Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell Demand Immediate End to Sudan War, Call Out UK Government for Enabling the Conflict

Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell Demand Immediate End to Sudan War, Call Out UK Government for Enabling the Conflict

25 January, 20262 sources compared
Sudan

Key Points from 2 News Sources

  1. 1

    Corbyn and McDonnell spoke at the Sudan Solidarity Conference in London on 17 January 2026

  2. 2

    Speakers demanded an immediate end to Sudan's war

  3. 3

    Delegates scrutinised and accused the UK government of enabling the Sudan conflict

Full Analysis Summary

Sudan Solidarity Conference

On 17 January 2026, trade unionists, Sudanese activists and international campaigners gathered in London for the Sudan Solidarity Conference organised by MENA Solidarity.

Speakers, including grassroots Sudanese organisers, diaspora groups and UK labour and anti-war activists, demanded an immediate end to the war in Sudan and urged scrutiny of Britain's role in the conflict; Radio Dabanga reporters covered the event and interviewed MPs Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell on the sidelines, emphasising the conference's political and grassroots coalition.

Coverage Differences

Consistency / Source overlap

Both Dabanga Radio TV Online (Other) and Radio Dabanga (Other) report nearly identical facts about the conference date, organisers, attendees and that Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell were interviewed; neither source presents a contrasting narrative or additional external viewpoints. The coverage is aligned in describing who organised the event (MENA Solidarity), who spoke (trade unionists, Sudanese activists, UK labour and anti‑war activists) and that demands focused on an immediate end to the war and scrutiny of Britain’s role.

Conference Condemnations and Reporting

Speakers at the conference explicitly condemned both the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF).

They characterized the conflict since April 2023 as a counter-revolutionary war that has targeted and devastated civilians, including activists, and has been marked by a long record of serious abuses described in coverage as 'alleged genocide and crimes against humanity'.

The reporting frames these claims as the conference speakers' characterization rather than as new legal findings, noting the language used by organisers and activists on the ground.

Coverage Differences

Tone / Severity alignment

Both sources use forceful language from conference speakers — phrases like 'counter‑revolutionary war', 'devastated civilians', and 'alleged genocide and crimes against humanity' — and attribute those descriptions to speakers and campaigners rather than presenting them as the reporting outlet’s independent legal determinations. There is no evident divergence between the two sources on this framing.

Arms trade and foreign involvement

Foreign involvement and the international arms trade were central themes at the conference, with campaigners citing reports that British-made military components recovered from former RSF areas likely reached the RSF via the UAE.

Delegates used these reports to challenge the effectiveness of UK export controls and to argue that British policy and the international arms trade have facilitated the arming of forces accused of serious abuses, thereby implicating external actors in the conflict’s escalation.

Coverage Differences

Narrative focus / Emphasis

Both sources emphasise foreign involvement and the international arms trade. They report campaigners’ claims that British‑made components were found in RSF areas and may have transited via the UAE, raising questions about UK export controls. There is no competing account offered in either source; instead both present the campaigners’ allegations as the central foreign‑involvement claim discussed at the conference.

UK migration and accountability

Conference delegates criticised the UK’s treatment of Sudanese refugees and called for broader political accountability at home, arguing that Britain’s migration and foreign policies have compounded suffering and require scrutiny alongside arms-export questions.

Coverage framed these demands as central to the conference’s agenda, linking domestic policy criticism to the overseas consequences of UK decisions.

Coverage Differences

Scope / Domestic focus

Both Dabanga Radio TV Online and Radio Dabanga include criticism of Britain’s treatment of Sudanese refugees as part of the conference agenda. Neither source provides a counter‑statement from UK officials nor detailed alternative perspectives on the UK government’s position, meaning the domestic critique is presented without immediate official response in these reports.

Media coverage of MPs

On the sidelines, Radio Dabanga's Amgad Abdelgadir interviewed Labour figures Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell.

Reports highlighted their presence and implied political support for the conference's calls to end the war and scrutinise UK policy.

The coverage framed these interviews as part of the broader activist-political coalition at the event but did not quote extended extracts of what the MPs said.

This left the record focused on the conference's demands rather than verbatim party statements in these snippets.

Coverage Differences

Detail / Quotations omitted

Both sources note that Amgad Abdelgadir interviewed Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell on the sidelines, but neither source provides extended verbatim quotations from those interviews in the provided snippets; the coverage therefore signals MP involvement without delivering detailed transcripted remarks. This is a shared limitation across the two reports rather than a divergence between them.

All 2 Sources Compared

Dabanga Radio TV Online

UK MPs Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell speak on Sudan war at solidarity conference

Read Original

Radio Dabanga

UK MPs Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell speak on Sudan war at solidarity conference

Read Original