LinkedIn Faces Dual US Class Actions For Browser Extension Scanning
Image: The Next Web

LinkedIn Faces Dual US Class Actions For Browser Extension Scanning

05 April, 2026.Technology and Science.4 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Two class-action lawsuits filed in California federal court over LinkedIn's browser-extension scanning.
  • LinkedIn says scanning prevents invasive web scraping; lawsuits challenge the practice.
  • Researchers label the practice 'BrowserGate' and claim it covertly scans extensions.

Lawsuits Filed

The complaints rely on a report by the German group Fairlinked.

Image from Ars Technica
Ars TechnicaArs Technica

LinkedIn does not deny it scans browsers to identify extensions.

The scanning is performed on Chrome and Chromium-based browsers.

LinkedIn's privacy policy discloses collecting information about browser and add-ons.

Fairlinked Report

Fairlinked's report detailed how LinkedIn checks for over 6,000 specific Chrome extensions.

The operation runs silently with no visible prompt.

Image from TechRadar
TechRadarTechRadar

BleepingComputer independently confirmed the scanning behavior.

The report alleges LinkedIn scans for over 200 competing products.

LinkedIn calls the scanning system Spectroscopy.

Privacy Dispute

The BrowserGate report and lawsuits allege the privacy policy isn't extensive enough.

PCMag quotes LinkedIn calling it a house of cards built entirely upon a fabrication.

The lawsuits demand LinkedIn pay damages and cease scanning.

The dispute centers on adequate disclosure and use of information.

More on Technology and Science