Malaysian Court Convicts Najib Razak of Embezzling RM2.3 Billion from 1MDB and Abusing Power to Launder Funds
Image: Букви

Malaysian Court Convicts Najib Razak of Embezzling RM2.3 Billion from 1MDB and Abusing Power to Launder Funds

26 December, 2025.Other.50 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Found guilty on four counts of abuse of power and 21 counts of money laundering.
  • Embezzled roughly RM2.3 billion from 1MDB into personal accounts.
  • Kuala Lumpur High Court judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah issued the guilty verdict; sentencing pending.

Najib 1MDB conviction summary

The charges included four counts of abuse of power and 21 counts of money‑laundering.

Image from ABC News
ABC NewsABC News

Judges and prosecutors said the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt and linked about RM2.2–2.3 billion (roughly $539–$569 million) in transfers to Najib’s personal accounts.

Sentencing had not yet been announced as mitigation was to follow.

The verdict was read after a trial that spanned years and heard dozens of witnesses.

It marks another high‑profile conviction in a scandal U.S. and Malaysian authorities say involved roughly $4.5 billion in looted funds.

Findings in Najib trial

The judge explicitly rejected Najib's defence that large transfers into his accounts were a Saudi political donation, repeatedly citing forged supporting documents and Najib's failure to verify the funds' origin.

Justice Collin Lawrence Sequerah said the prosecution had proven the money clearly came from 1MDB and pointed to an unmistakable bond with fugitive financier Low Taek Jho (Jho Low), who prosecutors say acted as an intermediary in siphoning funds.

Image from Al Jazeera
Al JazeeraAl Jazeera

Several reports noted the judge's finding that Najib took steps that shielded him or obstructed inquiries into the transfers.

1MDB funds linked to Najib

Reporting on the scale of the 1MDB looting and the portion tied specifically to Najib varies between outlets and between ringgit and U.S. dollar-based summaries.

The judge is yet to deliver the complete verdict, but Najib has been found guilty of abuse of power and money laundering

Al JazeeraAl Jazeera

Multiple outlets repeat investigators' estimates that roughly $4.5 billion was siphoned from 1MDB overall, while the sums attributed to Najib's accounts are reported as approximately RM2.2-2.3 billion (about $539-$569 million), 'more than $700 million,' or as 'more than $1 billion' in some accounts.

U.S. filings and investigative pieces add further detail, with some filings cited in reporting alleging specific transfers of about $681 million into accounts linked to Najib ahead of Malaysia's 2013 election.

Najib's legal and custodial status

Najib's legal and custodial status was a focus of media coverage.

He is already serving a sentence from a 2020 SRC International conviction and began serving that sentence in August 2022.

Image from Anadolu Ajansı
Anadolu AjansıAnadolu Ajansı

Many outlets noted that Najib's lawyers planned to appeal the new convictions and that mitigation submissions were expected ahead of sentencing.

Earlier this week the High Court refused his bid to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest.

Reporting varied on the current length of his incarceration because of differences in how earlier sentences were reported and later altered by Malaysia's Pardons Board.

Political and legal fallout

Coverage highlighted 1MDB's role in toppling Najib's government in 2018.

Image from Bangkok Post
Bangkok PostBangkok Post

It noted global probes that led to prosecutions and fines, including penalties tied to banks such as Goldman Sachs.

Coverage also pointed to potential domestic political strain for Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's coalition now that Najib's UMNO remains politically influential.

Some outlets framed the verdict as a legal milestone and an affirmation of accountability.

Others highlighted unanswered questions, including that fugitive financier Jho Low remains at large.

They noted Najib's supporters insist he was treated unfairly.

Observers warned that appeals and mitigation could prolong the legal process.

More on Other