Manhattan Jury Finds Live Nation Operated Illegal Monopoly, Threatens Breakup
Image: Whiskey Riff

Manhattan Jury Finds Live Nation Operated Illegal Monopoly, Threatens Breakup

15 April, 2026.Business.17 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Manhattan jury found Live Nation illegally monopolized the U.S. live event ticketing market.
  • Verdict could pave the way for breaking up Live Nation and Ticketmaster.
  • Trial in Manhattan federal court addressed Live Nation's control over venues and promotions.

Jury Finds Live Nation Illegal Monopoly

The jury determined that concertgoers paid an extra $1.72 per ticket as a direct result of Live Nation's anti-competitive practices.

Image from 20 Minutes
20 Minutes20 Minutes

The ruling came despite a tentative settlement the DOJ had reached with Live Nation just weeks earlier.

34 of the attorneys general pressed forward against the settlement.

Judge Subramanian still has to determine remedies at a later date.

Slack Messages Reveal Corporate Attitude

Internal Slack messages surfaced during the trial showing Live Nation employees joking about taking advantage of customers.

An employee said, 'These people are so stupid, I almost feel bad taking advantage of them BAHAHAHAHAHA.'

Image from American Economic Liberties Project
American Economic Liberties ProjectAmerican Economic Liberties Project

Live Nation argued these remarks represented off-the-cuff banter, not policy.

Rapino disavowed the exchange during his testimony, saying it’s disgusting.

States Press Forward After DOJ Settlement

The jury found in favor of the states on every claim.

The states pushed for a breakup of Live Nation and Ticketmaster.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the decision a historic and resounding victory.

Potential Breakup and Next Steps

Judge Subramanian will decide the appropriate remedy.

The jury's damages finding applies to a limited number of tickets.

Image from Business Insider
Business InsiderBusiness Insider

Live Nation said it remains confident the ultimate outcome will not be materially different than the DOJ settlement.

The company is expected to appeal the ruling.

The verdict caps off the most significant effort yet to rein in the company.

More on Business