
Netanyahu confidante on war with Iran: Trump, Israel had ‘incredible foresight’ to attack ‘murderous’ regime
Interview about Netanyahu's mindset
CNN's Erin Burnett interviewed Michael Eisenberg.
“CNN's Erin Burnett talks to Michael Eisenberg, a close confidant and adviser to Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu, about Netanyahu's mindset as Israel continues to strike Iran”
The article describes Eisenberg as a close confidant and adviser to Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu.

Burnett asked him about Netanyahu's mindset as Israel continues to strike Iran.
Eisenberg interview quote
In the interview, Eisenberg told Burnett that Trump and Israel had "incredible foresight" to attack a "murderous" regime.
The article reports that Eisenberg used those exact words to justify or praise the attacks.

Eisenberg remarks on strikes
The article frames Eisenberg's remarks amid ongoing Israeli strikes on Iran and conveys strong support from Netanyahu's circle for military action.
“CNN's Erin Burnett talks to Michael Eisenberg, a close confidant and adviser to Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu, about Netanyahu's mindset as Israel continues to strike Iran”
The article does not specify which attacks he meant, the timing, the targets, casualty figures, or whether he referred to coordinated action by Trump and Israel or to separate actions.
Because those specifics are not given, the details remain unclear.
Key Takeaways
- Michael Eisenberg is a close confidant and adviser to Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu.
- Eisenberg praised Trump and Israel's 'incredible foresight' in attacking Iran's 'murderous' regime.
- CNN's Erin Burnett interviewed Eisenberg about Netanyahu's mindset as Israel continues to strike Iran.
More on Iran-Israel

Israel Pounds Tehran, Beirut With Broad-Scale Airstrikes
16 sources compared

US and Israel Intensify Airstrikes on Tehran, Hit Iranian Drone-Carrier Ship
11 sources compared

US Sinks Iranian Warship
19 sources compared

US, Israel Pound Iran After Killing Ayatollah Ali Khamenei; Trump Warns War Could Last Weeks
37 sources compared