President Donald Trump Seeks to Deploy Thousands of Foreign Troops to Police Gaza Ceasefire at Inaugural Board of Peace Meeting

President Donald Trump Seeks to Deploy Thousands of Foreign Troops to Police Gaza Ceasefire at Inaugural Board of Peace Meeting

18 February, 20266 sources compared
War on Gaza

Key Points from 6 News Sources

  1. 1

    President Donald Trump's Board of Peace plans thousands of foreign troops to police Gaza ceasefire

  2. 2

    Billions of dollars in pledges expected to fund Gaza rebuilding

  3. 3

    Inaugural Washington meeting will include about two dozen countries under a UN mandate

Full Analysis Summary

Gaza ceasefire coordination

President Donald Trump will chair the inaugural meeting of his newly created 'Board of Peace' in Washington to coordinate the next phase of the Gaza ceasefire, humanitarian relief and reconstruction.

Members pledged roughly $5 billion and personnel commitments including thousands of foreign troops, according to multiple reports.

Fox News says the meeting aims to include an international stabilization force and that at least 20 countries are expected to attend, among them the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Qatar, Turkey, Israel and Indonesia.

Fox News also notes Trump's claim that members have 'already pledged about $5 billion and personnel commitments.'

thenationalnews likewise reports the board will 'finalize plans for thousands of troops to police a Gaza ceasefire' and says Trump 'said on Sunday that board members have pledged more than $5 billion for Gaza aid and rebuilding.'

Reports differ on the pledged amount, with Fox News and Trump's quoted claim citing about $5 billion while thenationalnews reports more than $5 billion.

Al Jazeera previews the meeting while warning critics see the pledge as insufficient.

The Friday Times places the broadcast in direct conjunction with Al Jazeera's investigative claims about Israeli operations in Gaza.

Coverage Differences

Tone/Emphasis

Fox News and thenationalnews present the BoP meeting emphasizing pledges, troop plans and concrete offers (Italy training police, Indonesia pledging troops), framing it as an operational next step. Al Jazeera frames the initiative skeptically as rhetoric with commitments that 'fall far short' of needs, while The Friday Times links the BoP timing to Al Jazeera's investigation alleging severe Israeli actions in Gaza and questions whether reconstruction funds alone suffice. Each source is reporting different aspects: Fox News and thenationalnews report on pledges and participants; Al Jazeera reports critics' views; The Friday Times reports the investigative claims and situational context.

Gaza stabilization plans

Several countries have offered concrete security roles, with Fox News reporting Italy 'offered to train a future Gaza police force' and that 'Indonesia has pledged thousands of troops for a prospective stabilization mission.'

thenationalnews confirms plans to finalize thousands of troops to police a Gaza ceasefire.

The board's backers present the force as part of reconstruction and stabilization.

Al Jazeera and analysts cited by Fox News warn the real test will be agreement on disarmament and whether pledges translate into effective long-term security.

The Friday Times says progress on the ceasefire's second phase — including demilitarization and governance — 'has been slow' and suggests Israel appears unwilling to cede control over large parts of the territory, complicating any foreign stabilization mission.

Coverage Differences

Narrative Framing

Fox News and thenationalnews describe concrete offers (Italy training police, Indonesia pledging troops) and frame them as operational steps. Al Jazeera frames these commitments skeptically, saying critics view them as insufficient and mostly rhetorical. The Friday Times focuses on how slow progress on demilitarization and Israel's apparent unwillingness to cede control could make foreign troop deployments ineffective. These are different emphases: operational readiness (Fox/thenationalnews), critical assessment of sufficiency (Al Jazeera), and strategic constraints on implementation (The Friday Times).

Gaza attack allegations

The Friday Times and Al Jazeera draw attention to serious allegations about Israeli military conduct in Gaza that coincide with the BoP meeting.

The Friday Times relays Al Jazeera’s Arab investigations programme 'The Rest of the Story,' which reports that Israeli forces used internationally banned thermal/thermobaric weapons in Gaza that can reach temperatures above 3,500°C.

The programme reportedly says at least 2,842 Palestinians 'evaporated,' leaving 'no recoverable remains.'

The Friday Times further states the investigation alleges much of the ammunition was supplied by the United States and describes the obliteration as systematic.

These investigative claims are cited by some commentators to argue that reconstruction funding must be tied to accountability and investigations into alleged war crimes before stabilization can succeed.

Coverage Differences

Unique Coverage / Severity

The Friday Times uniquely relays Al Jazeera’s investigative allegations of thermobaric weapon use and mass 'evaporation' of Palestinians, presenting a severe depiction of Israeli military actions. Al Jazeera’s preview acknowledges criticism of the BoP’s adequacy but does not itself, in the snippet, list the thermobaric details — The Friday Times explicitly cites the Al Jazeera programme. Fox News and thenationalnews focus on pledges and troop plans and do not report these allegations in their snippets, making this a significant reporting gap between outlets.

Concerns about the BoP

Observers also flag institutional and political friction.

Fox News reports that 'several European allies have declined to join and warned the board’s charter appears to diverge from the U.N. Security Council’s Gaza-focused, time-limited framework.'

thenationalnews notes the board 'has a UN Security Council mandate but faces questions about whether it might compete with the United Nations in other areas.'

This presents a tension: one outlet says the charter diverges from the U.N. framework while another describes the board as having a U.N. Security Council mandate.

Al Jazeera highlights critics who view the BoP as rhetorical.

The Friday Times stresses that 'reconstruction funds alone are insufficient unless future peace is secured and past abuses are accounted for,' and calls on Muslim states attending the BoP to press issues of accountability.

That mix of institutional caution, skepticism about sufficiency, and calls for accountability illustrates how the BoP may face legitimacy and implementation hurdles despite pledges.

Coverage Differences

Institutional Concern/Omission

Fox News emphasizes political pushback from European allies and divergence from the U.N. framework, thenationalnews raises the question of competition with the United Nations despite a Security Council mandate, Al Jazeera foregrounds critics calling the initiative rhetorical, and The Friday Times explicitly ties reconstruction to accountability for alleged abuses. These differences show Fox News centers diplomatic alignment concerns, thenationalnews highlights UN mandate ambiguity, Al Jazeera stresses critics’ skepticism, and The Friday Times centers alleged abuses that observers say must be addressed for reconstruction to be legitimate.

Board of Peace outcomes

The inaugural Board of Peace meeting bundled pledges, troop proposals and promises of reconstruction.

Sources disagree sharply on feasibility, sufficiency and context.

Fox News and thenationalnews emphasize practical pledges and troop offers, while Al Jazeera and The Friday Times emphasize skepticism, gaps and the need for accountability in light of serious investigative allegations about Israeli military actions.

The outcome is uncertain: mediators continue to work on demilitarization and governance, but 'progress on the ceasefire’s second phase ... has been slow.'

Whether foreign troops, training offers and pledged dollars will translate into a stable, accountable Gaza remains contested across the reporting.

Coverage Differences

Conclusion / Uncertainty

Fox News/thenationalnews conclude with emphasis on pledges and operational steps, suggesting momentum; Al Jazeera and The Friday Times conclude with skepticism that funding and security commitments are sufficient and insist reconstruction must be paired with accountability for alleged abuses. This demonstrates a split between outlets that frame the BoP as a potentially practical plan and outlets that see it as rhetorically insufficient and out of step with demands for justice and investigations.

All 6 Sources Compared

Al Jazeera

‘Board of Peace’: Reality vs Rhetoric

Read Original

Devdiscourse

Trump's Board of Peace: A Gamble for Middle East Stability

Read Original

Foreign Policy

Billions in Pledges Expected for Trump’s Board of Peace but Doubts Persist

Read Original

Fox News

Trump convenes first ‘Board of Peace’ meeting as Gaza rebuild hinges on Hamas disarmament

Read Original

The Friday Times

Trump's Board Of Peace Must First Face Gaza's Truth - And The US Role In That Story

Read Original

thenationalnews

Trump's Board of Peace to discuss money and international troops for Gaza

Read Original