Published

Gaza Genocide25 February, 20263 min read

Prime Minister Modi Embraces Netanyahu, Ignores Gaza Genocide

Addressed the Knesset, becoming the first Indian prime minister to speak in Israeli parliament Backed Israel's Gaza campaign while ignoring allegations of genocide

Prime Minister Modi Embraces Netanyahu, Ignores Gaza Genocide
Image: TRT World
Compared

38 outlets told this the same way.

Scored

BBC was read line by line by the Watchdog: 6.8. See the score →

Modi's Israel visit

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a two-day state visit to Israel on Feb. 25-26, 2026.

“Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi began a two-day visit to Israel aimed at deepening security, economic and technological ties.”
Gulf News

Israeli and many Indian outlets framed the trip as a major upgrade in India–Israel ties, emphasizing technology, defence and trade cooperation.

Image from Al Jazeera
Image: Al Jazeera

Modi received ceremonial honours during the visit.

He met Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Isaac Herzog.

He addressed the Knesset amid events billed as an innovation showcase focused on AI, quantum computing and cybersecurity.

The visit included plans for new centres of excellence and bilateral agreements.

Israeli coverage presented the trip as historic and aimed at elevating the relationship to 'special strategic relations'.

Indian mainstream outlets highlighted the warm reception, joint initiatives on defence and science, and ongoing FTA talks as concrete outcomes of the visit.

Modi Gaza visit criticism

Modi’s public remarks and the itinerary drew sustained criticism because he did not directly condemn Israeli actions in Gaza or press Israel on civilian deaths, a silence highlighted by several outlets and opposition leaders at home.

TRT World reports Modi "made no public criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza or the occupied West Bank," and Indian opposition figures such as Priyanka Gandhi had urged him to mention the deaths in Gaza - a demand repeated in coverage by Hindustan Times and Gulf News.

Image from Al Jazeera
Image: Al Jazeera

Other outlets record Modi offering condolences for the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks and endorsing a UN Security Council-backed Gaza peace initiative, but critics said those remarks did not meet calls to acknowledge Gaza’s humanitarian toll.

Defence and technology cooperation

Coverage focused on an acceleration of defence and technology cooperation, a major objective of the trip that critics say has real consequences given India’s role as a leading buyer of Israeli arms. The Jerusalem Post and other Israeli outlets highlighted a classified defence framework and potential access to advanced systems, while TRT World and Dainik Jagran cited reporting of Israeli drones, joint ventures such as an Adani–Elbit tie, and SIPRI‑based figures indicating India accounted for a large share of Israeli defence exports. Several sources also referenced reporting that arms‑related transfers and defence‑industry links continued during the Gaza war, a point that fuels criticism of the trip’s timing.

“A classified defense framework is expected to deepen military cooperation — possibly giving India access to sensitive systems such as Israel’s laser-based Iron Beam.”
The Jerusalem Post

Reactions to diplomatic visit

Domestically and internationally, the visit produced sharply divergent reactions. Supporters and Israeli officials hailed the strategic payoff. Opponents in India and several international commentators warned the trip risks legitimising Israeli policy amid reports of heavy civilian casualties in Gaza.

Indian opposition leaders called the visit a betrayal of Palestinian concerns and urged Modi to raise Gaza casualties. International outlets noted India’s broader balancing act with Gulf states and Iran and recalled India’s past abstentions or positions at UN votes as context for critics’ unease.

Image from Al Jazeera
Image: Al Jazeera

Press freedom and protests

A final thread in coverage highlights press freedom, domestic protest and the political costs of the trip. Investigative and alternative outlets reported measures to restrict critical voices and protests tied to the visit. The Canary says India ordered X to block the work of a journalist who reported on India–Israel ties and argues this fits a broader pattern of pressure on critical reporting.

“India has ordered X (formerly Twitter) to block access to the work of Azad Essa ... the government says the takedown is based on legal prohibitions; Essa says it is retaliation for his reporting on deepening India–Israel ties.”
thecanary.co

Indian outlets record street and parliamentary protest and arrests. Other pieces note India’s concern to balance Israel ties with Gulf relationships that depend on Indian labour and investment.