Rapid Support Forces' Drone Attacks Kill At Least 104 Civilians in Kordofan

Rapid Support Forces' Drone Attacks Kill At Least 104 Civilians in Kordofan

17 December, 20255 sources compared
Sudan

Key Points from 5 News Sources

  1. 1

    At least 104 civilians killed by drone strikes across Sudan's Kordofan region

  2. 2

    Cholera and dengue outbreaks have surged, overwhelming health services and displacing civilians

  3. 3

    Clashes between the Sudanese army and the RSF involved air and drone strikes hitting civilian sites

Full Analysis Summary

Kordofan drone strike crisis

Since Dec. 4, multiple drone strikes in Sudan’s Kordofan region have killed at least 104 civilians, including 43 children, the UN rights office (OHCHR) reported.

According to Balkanweb, one strike in Kalogi hit a kindergarten and a hospital and caused the bulk of the deaths.

This high toll comes amid a broader conflict that Al Jazeera says has killed at least 40,000 people since April 2023 and displaced more than 14 million.

Observers are concerned that the attacks in Kordofan are feeding into the region’s largest ongoing humanitarian crisis.

Local reporting also shows active clashes across Kordofan between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), underlining how the drone strikes are occurring within a wider, multi-front war zone.

Coverage Differences

Missed information / Attribution ambiguity

Balkanweb reports the UN rights office (OHCHR) attribution of 'multiple drone strikes' and casualty figures but does not explicitly assign blame to a specific armed actor in the snippet provided, while Sada News reports that the Sudanese army conducted airstrikes on RSF positions, describing government operations rather than drone attacks attributed to another force. Al Jazeera focuses on the broader humanitarian toll and context rather than pinpointing responsibility for the Kordofan strikes.

Reported deadly strikes

Balkanweb provides a detailed account of the deadliest single incident, a strike in Kalogi that hit a kindergarten and a hospital and reportedly killed at least 89 people, including eight women and 43 children.

Separate attacks on Dec. 13 and Dec. 14 reportedly killed six UN peacekeepers in Kadugli and at least six people, wounding 12 including medical staff, in Dilling.

Balkanweb presents these figures as UN-sourced, emphasizing that civilian infrastructure was hit and medical staff were among the casualties.

At the same time, local military reporting (Sada News) describes government air operations targeting RSF combat positions elsewhere in Kordofan.

Together the reports illustrate that both civilian and military sites are being struck amid the fighting.

Coverage Differences

Detail emphasis / Tone

Balkanweb emphasizes civilian casualties and specific civilian sites hit (kindergarten, hospital) and cites UN figures, conveying a humanitarian and rights-focused tone; وكالة صدى نيوز emphasizes military engagements and government claims of targeting RSF positions and destroyed combat vehicles, conveying a military operational tone. Al Jazeera broadens the frame to the nationwide humanitarian emergency with large-scale displacement and deaths.

Kordofan strike attribution

Responsibility for the drone strikes in Kordofan is unclear based on the provided reporting.

Balkanweb attributes casualty figures to the UN rights office but does not assign blame in the excerpt.

Sada News quotes military statements that the Sudanese army carried out airstrikes on RSF positions, implying government action but not directly linking those strikes to the UN's drone-strike toll.

Al Jazeera does not discuss the Kordofan drone strikes specifically in the snippet provided, instead emphasizing nationwide casualties and displacement, which affects how readers interpret the Kordofan events within a larger crisis.

Because the available snippets do not provide a direct, consistent attribution, asserting which actor launched the lethal drone strikes would be speculative beyond these sources.

Coverage Differences

Contradiction / Attribution

There is no direct, consistent attribution across the sources: Balkanweb (reporting UN OHCHR figures) does not name an attacker in the excerpt, while وكالة صدى نيوز reports army-conducted airstrikes against RSF positions; Al Jazeera provides national-scale casualty figures but does not address Kordofan attribution. This creates an evidentiary gap on who conducted the drone strikes that killed civilians.

Humanitarian toll and fighting

Balkanweb highlights civilian deaths, including many children, damaged health and education facilities, and UN warnings about escalating fighting and calls for an immediate ceasefire.

Al Jazeera places Kordofan’s toll within a countrywide emergency that has put Sudan atop the IRC Emergency Watchlist and caused mass displacement.

Sada News records continuing kinetic operations and notes the army said strikes were based on intelligence of planned RSF and Popular Movement attacks.

Taken together, these perspectives show overlapping concerns: mass civilian harm, an overwhelmed humanitarian situation, and ongoing military operations.

They differ in emphasis and in the implication of responsibility.

Coverage Differences

Tone / Narrative

Balkanweb uses UN-sourced casualty and facility-impact details and a rights-based, urgent tone calling for a ceasefire; Al Jazeera frames the situation as a large-scale humanitarian catastrophe with displacement and rankings by humanitarian organisations; وكالة صدى نيوز focuses on military claims and operational outcomes, presenting a security/military narrative. Each source’s type and audience appear to shape whether the reporting foregrounds victims, humanitarian statistics, or combat operations.

Kordofan strikes and impact

Given gaps and differences in the excerpts, a cautious conclusion can be drawn from these sources.

UN reporting, cited by Balkanweb, records at least 104 civilian deaths in Kordofan from multiple drone strikes, including a devastating Kalogi incident.

Sada News documents concurrent army air operations against RSF positions in the same region, and Al Jazeera places these events within a broader, catastrophic national emergency affecting millions.

Together, the sources corroborate large-scale civilian suffering and active military operations but do not provide a single, consistent attribution for the drone strikes, leaving accountability unclear.

Coverage Differences

Synthesis / Confirmation vs. Attribution gap

All three sources converge on the scale of suffering and ongoing combat (confirmation), but they diverge on operational detail and attribution: Balkanweb reports UN-cited drone-strike civilian casualties, وكالة صدى نيوز reports army airstrikes on RSF positions, and Al Jazeera emphasises the national humanitarian crisis without detailing Kordofan perpetrators — leaving a gap on which actor launched the lethal drone strikes.

All 5 Sources Compared

Al Jazeera

Drone attacks kill over 100 civilians across war-torn Sudan’s Kordofan

Read Original

Al-Jazeera Net

Fighting in Kordofan has escalated amid the spread of epidemics, and the killing of 100 civilians by drones has been documented.

Read Original

Balkanweb

UN: More than 100 civilians killed in drone strikes in Sudan

Read Original

Dabanga Radio TV Online

♦ Sudan news highlights ♦

Read Original

وكالة صدى نيوز

Intensified Fighting Between the Sudanese Army and Rapid Support Forces Leads to the Death of 100 Civilians

Read Original