SDF Refuse To Withdraw From Aleppo After Syrian Government Declares Truce
Image: شفق نيوز

SDF Refuse To Withdraw From Aleppo After Syrian Government Declares Truce

09 January, 2026.Syria.29 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Syrian Defense Ministry ordered SDF fighters to withdraw from Sheikh Maqsoud, Ashrafiyeh and Bani Zeid
  • SDF and local Kurdish councils rejected the evacuation order and refused to leave their districts
  • Syrian army renewed strikes, launched an operation, and declared Sheikh Maqsoud a closed military zone

Aleppo ceasefire and response

After days of heavy fighting in northern Aleppo, Syria’s defence ministry announced a ceasefire ordering Kurdish SDF fighters to withdraw from the Sheikh Maqsoud, Ashrafiyeh and Bani Zeid neighbourhoods.

Syria’s Defense Ministry announced a ceasefire after three days of clashes between government forces and Kurdish fighters in Aleppo, effective at 3 a

abcnews.goabcnews.go

The ministry said Kurdish fighters would be moved, with light arms, to Kurdish areas further east.

Image from abcnews.go
abcnews.goabcnews.go

Local Kurdish councils and the SDF refused to comply, saying they would remain and defend their districts and had pushed back government attacks.

The pause was reported as taking effect at 03:00 local time and included plans for safe passage.

This account synthesises reporting that describes both the government’s formal order and the Kurdish refusal.

Displacement and reporting differences

The clashes triggered large-scale displacement of civilians.

Several outlets reported roughly 140,000–142,000 people displaced or evacuated, while pro-government sources gave higher figures, with one report citing about 165,000.

Image from Al Jazeera
Al JazeeraAl Jazeera

Other outlets described 'thousands' or 'tens of thousands' fleeing, underscoring both the rapid movement of civilians and reporting differences between state-linked, international and regional press.

Military operations and claims

Government forces reported targeted operations, published maps of target areas, and declared Sheikh Maqsoud a closed military zone with curfews and humanitarian corridors.

I can do that — I just need the article or enough info to find it in my memory

Al JazeeraAl Jazeera

Kurdish sources said they had struck back and accused pro-government units of heavy shelling of residential areas and hospitals.

State and pro-government outlets described the army retaking Ashrafiyeh and Bani Zeid and preparing evacuations.

Kurdish security (Asayish) and SDF statements described strikes, clashes, and measures they said were endangering civilians.

Regional diplomatic reactions

International actors reacted unevenly.

The United States welcomed the ceasefire, urged its extension, and offered help to de‑escalate.

Image from Al Jazeera
Al JazeeraAl Jazeera

Turkey publicly criticised the SDF and said it would assist Syria if asked.

Kurdish and regional actors warned of possible forced displacement and demographic change.

European figures were reported visiting Damascus around the same period, underscoring divergent regional priorities.

These reactions reflect diplomatic efforts to stabilise the situation but also contrasting strategic interests.

Media coverage differences

West Asian and state-linked outlets foreground Syrian government claims of restoring state control, name specific military targets, and cite alleged SDF violations.

Image from Al Jazeera
Al JazeeraAl Jazeera

Western mainstream outlets emphasize the humanitarian toll and the diplomatic push for a truce and safe passage.

Kurdish-oriented and regional sources highlight SDF warnings about forced displacement, demographic change, and potential war crimes.

Readers should note these differences reflect the sources' perspectives.

Some claims, for example allegations of SDF abuses cited by the army, are reported as government accusations rather than independently verified facts.

More on Syria