Full Analysis Summary
Meeting on Gaza Ceasefire Issues
Seven Muslim-majority states—Turkey, UAE, Indonesia, Qatar, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan—met in Istanbul on November 4, 2025, hosted by Turkey’s Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, to denounce Israel’s ongoing airstrikes and blockade during the ceasefire and to assert Palestinian self-determination.
İlke Haber Ajansı reports the ministers condemned Israel’s repeated airstrikes and blockade that have killed over 200 Palestinians since the October 10 truce began and warned the ceasefire could collapse.
They insisted Palestinians must lead reconstruction and security and rejected any foreign‑imposed governance.
Folha de S.Paulo also reports the seven insisted Palestinians should govern Gaza without external control, while framing the truce as U.S.-brokered and fragile amid mutual accusations of violations.
The report highlights Turkey’s push for urgent reconstruction and the return of displaced people.
Coverage Differences
Tone and narrative
İlke Haber Ajansı (Other) centers Israeli responsibility, reporting ministers condemned Israel’s airstrikes and blockade, citing 200+ Palestinians killed since the truce began, and emphasizes Palestinian-led governance. Folha de S.Paulo (Latin American) maintains the Palestinian self-rule line but frames the ceasefire as U.S.-brokered and “fragile” with mutual accusations, introducing a more process-oriented, bilateral-violation narrative.
Missed information
İlke Haber Ajansı (Other) specifies the casualty figure since the truce and directly names Israeli airstrikes and blockade as causes; Folha de S.Paulo (Latin American) omits that death toll and instead foregrounds the U.S. brokerage and the general fragility of the truce.
Gaza Stabilization Efforts
The ministers pressed for concrete steps: preserve the ceasefire, back a two-state framework, demand Palestinian-led governance, and explore an international presence to stabilize Gaza that does not displace Palestinian authority.
İlke Haber Ajansı reports discussions on establishing a UN‑mandated international stabilization force with Muslim troop contributions and warns against any new forms of external control.
These steps are tied to Palestinian-led reconstruction efforts.
Folha de S.Paulo reports Turkey is interested in joining a stabilization force proposed by the U.S.
Israel opposes Turkey’s role due to perceived closeness to Hamas, while Turkish officials push for urgent reconstruction and the return of displaced people.
Coverage Differences
Attribution and framing
İlke Haber Ajansı (Other) frames the stabilization force as a UN-mandated idea discussed by the Muslim ministers themselves, with Muslim troop contributions, aligning it with Palestinian control. Folha de S.Paulo (Latin American) frames the force as a U.S.-proposed initiative that Turkey wants to join, adding Israel’s opposition to Turkish participation—information absent in İlke’s account.
Missed information
Folha de S.Paulo (Latin American) highlights Israel’s stated opposition to Turkish participation in a stabilization force and details about displacement; İlke Haber Ajansı (Other) does not mention Israeli objections but stresses rejection of foreign-imposed governance and Palestinian-led reconstruction.
Ceasefire Disputes and Humanitarian Issues
Accounts of who is violating the ceasefire diverge.
İlke Haber Ajansı reports President Erdoğan praised Hamas for adhering to the ceasefire and condemned Israel’s continued attacks.
The report cites Israeli airstrikes and a blockade that killed more than 200 Palestinians since the truce started.
Folha de S.Paulo describes a fragile U.S.-brokered truce with mutual accusations.
The report adds that returning the bodies of hostages killed in Gaza has been delayed.
Hamas cites the complexity of the task amid the territory’s devastation.
The Istanbul group, as reported by İlke, demanded immediate humanitarian access and Palestinian-led security.
These demands are part of sustaining the halt in Israeli attacks.
Coverage Differences
Contradiction in emphasis
İlke Haber Ajansı (Other) highlights Erdoğan’s praise for Hamas adhering to the ceasefire and squarely blames Israel for violations and ongoing attacks. Folha de S.Paulo (Latin American) avoids endorsing that claim, instead framing the situation as mutual accusations of violations and emphasizing operational difficulties around recovering hostages’ bodies.
Istanbul Summit on Gaza Crisis
Both sources show the Istanbul summit pushing a coordinated Muslim diplomatic track that demands Israel halt attacks, allow immediate aid, and accept Palestinian self-rule over Gaza’s reconstruction and security.
İlke Haber Ajansı calls the gathering a significant escalation, demanding Israel’s full withdrawal, immediate humanitarian access, and Palestinian-controlled reconstruction, while urging Muslim nations to lead rebuilding and aid.
Folha de S.Paulo situates the meeting in a U.S.-driven diplomatic calendar—just before Washington’s planned 20‑point plan—and underscores unresolved issues such as the disarmament of Hamas, governance arrangements, Israel’s opposition to a Turkish role in any force, and the return of displaced people.
Coverage Differences
Focus and agenda-setting
İlke Haber Ajansı (Other) emphasizes maximal demands—full Israeli withdrawal, immediate aid, and Palestinian-controlled reconstruction—portraying the summit as a diplomatic escalation. Folha de S.Paulo (Latin American) highlights the U.S. timetable, disarmament and governance hurdles, and Israeli opposition to a Turkish role, painting a more procedural and contested path ahead.