Sudanese Army Shells Rapid Support Forces Positions in North Kordofan
Image: Zoom Bangla News

Sudanese Army Shells Rapid Support Forces Positions in North Kordofan

16 December, 2025.Sudan.15 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Sudanese army shelled RSF positions in North Kordofan.
  • Fierce battles in North Kordofan caused mass displacement and UN humanitarian appeals.
  • Drone strikes in Kordofan killed six Bangladeshi UN peacekeepers.

Fighting in Kordofan region

Army sources reported artillery struck RSF positions near Jabra al-Sheikh.

Image from African Insider
African InsiderAfrican Insider

The wider conflict has seen drone strikes and shelling across Kordofan.

The army also reported an RSF drone hit in South Kordofan locations such as Samasem and Abu Jibaiha.

It said its forces cleared three fronts around Kadugli, the capital of South Kordofan.

These frontline clashes form part of a broader campaign linking army-held northern, eastern and central areas with RSF-held Darfur.

Kordofan has become a strategic hotspot.

Humanitarian crisis in Kordofan

The fighting in Kordofan is set against a dire humanitarian backdrop and a siege-like situation in parts of the region.

Journalists and aid agencies describe Kadugli and surrounding towns as facing severe shortages of food and medicine, with the UN's OCHA warning of a 'massive humanitarian need' and appealing for $2.9 billion to assist about 20 million people, including millions displaced.

Image from Al-Jazeera Net
Al-Jazeera NetAl-Jazeera Net

Local reporting and AFP accounts cited in the Bangkok Post describe families surviving on minimal food, foraging and tending tiny vegetable plots under a communications blackout and constant fear as the city remains isolated and its only road is cut off.

Attack on UN peacekeepers

Multiple outlets report a drone strike on a UNISFA logistics base in Kadugli that killed six Bangladeshi peacekeepers and wounded eight.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres condemned the attack as horrific and warned that strikes on peacekeepers may amount to war crimes.

Sudan’s army blamed the RSF for the strike, while some reports note the RSF has not claimed responsibility and the UN had not attributed responsibility in cited statements.

Media reporting contrasts

Reporting across outlets varies in tone and supplementary details.

Some emphasise military control lines and leadership moves, while others focus on legal and humanitarian consequences.

Image from Al-Jazeera Net
Al-Jazeera NetAl-Jazeera Net

Azerbaycan24 situates the attack amid political manoeuvres.

It notes rival leaders named RSF commander Mohamed 'Hemedti' Dagalo chair of a new presidential council, a move rejected by the UN and African Union.

African Insider and Bangkok Post stress casualty totals, displaced populations and alleged atrocities.

Western mainstream outlets like Mirage foreground international law and aid statistics.

Local and regional outlets such as Zoom Bangla and Dabanga highlight siege conditions and specific strikes on civilian infrastructure.

Escalating conflict and accountability

The hostilities have severe humanitarian consequences, have drawn international condemnation, and reportedly resulted in the deaths of UN personnel.

Image from Azerbaycan24
Azerbaycan24Azerbaycan24

Attribution for specific attacks remains contested: army statements blaming the RSF are widely reported, while several outlets note the UN had not assigned responsibility and the RSF had not claimed the strike.

Across source types the overall picture is intense combat, growing humanitarian need, and competing narratives over blame and political legitimacy, with international actors calling for accountability.

More on Sudan