Trump Administration Demands Five Years of Social Media, DNA and Iris Scans from Visa Waiver Tourists

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), part of the Department of Homeland Security, published a Federal Register proposal to make social media history mandatory for many short-stay visitors using the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA).

“Visitors from ‘visa waiver’ countries will have to provide a five-year social media history to enter the US”

Al Jazeera

The rule would require up to five years of social-media history from travelers in the Visa Waiver Program and would add expanded personal data fields described as "high-value".

Al Jazeera

The public comment period for the draft is 60 days.

Supporters say the change tightens vetting and improves national security.

Critics call the proposal invasive and warn it could chill speech.

The proposal lists additional data elements beyond social-media handles, including email addresses used over the past ten years, phone numbers used in the past five years, names, birthdates, contact details for close family members, and identity-verification photos or selfies.

Some outlets and the draft itself also flag technical fields and biomarkers, from IP addresses and photo metadata to expanded biometrics, and a few sources report even broader measures (including DNA and iris scans) where feasible.

Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Proponents say these fields are 'high-value' for automated risk screening, while opponents say they raise new privacy and security risks.

Officials and supporters present the package as part of a broader national-security push, citing an executive order to 'vet and screen to the maximum degree possible' and recent security incidents used to justify tougher scrutiny.

“By Rudi Maxwell Topic:Travel and Tourism Australians travelling to the US may soon have to provide access to their social media history for the past five years”

Australian Broadcasting Corporation

The timing ahead of major inbound events such as the 2026 FIFA World Cup and 2028 Olympics is highlighted by several outlets as a practical reason for tightening checks, and the administration frames the measures as closing gaps in existing vetting systems.

Civil-liberties groups, privacy advocates and some industry voices warn the proposal amounts to mass surveillance, risks chilling free expression, and could deter tourists and business travelers.

Legal and human-rights organizations say the rule uses vague standards that could enable stereotyping or political targeting, and several outlets report advocacy groups are preparing challenges.

BBC

Travel and tourism outlets also warn that the new requirements could reduce inbound tourism at an economically sensitive moment.

At present the rule is a proposal.

“I don’t see the article text or a link”

btimesonline

It is in the Federal Register and open for a roughly 60-day public comment period.

btimesonline

Details remain unsettled.

Several reports note unanswered questions, including whether applicants must provide account access or only identifiers.

Reports also ask how long data will be retained and how it will be shared across agencies.

Observers question whether processing times could lengthen.

One detailed account projects processing impact scenarios if the agency proceeds with an app and expanded biometrics.

Observers across source types stress that public comments, technical feedback and potential legal challenges could shape the final rule.