Trump Administration Forces States to Revoke SNAP Food Benefits for 42 Million Americans

After the U.S. Supreme Court temporarily stayed lower-court rulings that had forced full November SNAP payouts, the Trump administration directed states to undo those disbursements, labeling them “unauthorized.”

“US President Donald Trump's administration is demanding states "undo" full SNAP benefits paid out under judges' orders last week, now that the US Supreme Court has stayed those rulings — marking the latest swing in a seesawing legal battle over the anti-hunger programme used by 42 million Americans”

1News

The U.S. Department of Agriculture warned that any full payments issued under prior court orders “must be undone immediately,” and states could face penalties for noncompliance.

1News

Several outlets report that a USDA memo instructed agencies not to send full-payment files to EBT processors and to reverse steps already taken.

The stakes are enormous: SNAP serves roughly 42 million Americans, and some states had already released full benefits when the stay arrived.

The legal fight escalated quickly.

Lower courts had ruled the administration must use additional resources to pay full November benefits, with some decisions ordering use of emergency funds to cover the nearly $9 billion monthly cost.

ABC10

The administration pushed back, favoring partial payments of about 65% and seeking appellate relief.

While the First Circuit denied an emergency injunction according to one report, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson temporarily paused the full-payment orders while the Court reviews the appeal—creating a window in which USDA told states to reverse full disbursements.

States reacted unevenly as the federal message changed frequently.

“States including New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin have been moving swiftly to release SNAP benefits to residents”

ABC11

Over two dozen states warned of severe financial and operational disruptions if Washington refused reimbursement for full benefits already sent.

Wisconsin, which paid out to roughly 700,000 residents, became a flashpoint.

Governor Tony Evers rejected the USDA’s demand to claw back payments, citing court orders and prior federal assurances.

Some officials publicly criticized the directive and signaled readiness to resist efforts to reclaim funds.

USDA’s operational directive was unusually detailed.

Mediaite reports the memo instructed regional SNAP directors not to distribute full benefits and to refrain from sending full payment files to EBT processors.

AL

The memo also required undoing steps that had already been taken.

AP and KUTV highlight the warning of penalties for noncompliance and describe the full November disbursements as unauthorized.

WRIC points out a key uncertainty regarding how this directive impacts states using their own funds compared to federal money.

Other outlets note that the Supreme Court’s stay allowed the administration to temporarily withhold billions as litigation continues.

Behind the legal fight is a grinding shutdown and mounting hardship.

“It looks like you haven't provided the news article yet”

Associated Press

Outlets note SNAP supports one in eight Americans, with an average of about $332 per household monthly.

Associated Press

Disruptions have fueled food bank demand.

Some state and local governments used emergency funds to plug gaps or help residents directly.

Coverage also points to political stalemate and escalating criticism.

Some describe the administration as refusing reimbursements and creating unnecessary hardship.

Others spotlight the congressional impasse prolonging the crisis.