Trump and Israel Attack Iran, Risking Wider Regional War

The United States and Israel carried out coordinated military strikes against Iran.

“Skip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footerHelp using this website - Accessibility statement Today's Paper Advertisement World Middle East Israel-Iran conflict Print article Jon Gambrell and Konstantin Toropin Updated Mar 1, 2026 – 1”

AFR

Multiple outlets described a broad, cross‑border campaign that U.S. officials framed as sweeping and "massive."

BBC

Coverage recorded conflicting labels: Open Magazine said the assault was codenamed "Operation Roaring Lion," while several Western outlets and the Pentagon described the campaign as "OPERATION EPIC FURY."

Reporting noted immediate defensive responses and alarm about a possible wider regional war as missile defenses and other emergency measures were activated.

President Donald Trump framed the attacks as necessary to eliminate threats and to produce political change in Tehran, using social-media video messages that invoked long-standing U.S. grievances.

Trump said the strikes were meant to "defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime."

CBS News

He called the campaign intended to bring about "a change in Tehran's leadership," and urged Iranians to seize the moment.

Outlets reported he signaled a broader goal of regime change.

Iran retaliated quickly, with outlets reporting missiles fired toward Israel and an attack on a U.S. military base in Bahrain.

“- Published The decision by the United States and Israel to plunge into a new war with Iran creates a highly dangerous moment with unpredictable consequences”

BBC

Israeli and U.S. officials said defensive systems were intercepting incoming strikes.

Reporting emphasized uncertainty over casualties.

State media claimed more than 50 people were killed at a girls' school in southern Iran, but news organizations described those figures as unclear and unverified.

The strikes drew legal and diplomatic pushback and calls for restraint.

Analysts and commentators noted Washington did not seek explicit Congressional or U.N. Security Council authorization and some argued the action raised legal questions under U.S. and international law.

GV Wire

Governments and international officials urged de-escalation, in several accounts sought emergency U.N. engagement, and warned of civilian harm.

Observers warned the strikes risked a wider regional war and could undermine diplomatic efforts.

Commentators described the campaign as a high-stakes foreign-policy gamble unlikely to deliver rapid regime collapse.

Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Voices across the coverage said the action may undercut hopes for a negotiated resolution while raising the prospect of extended conflict and domestic political consequences for President Trump.