Trump Assembles 'Board of Peace' With Autocrats and Leader Wanted for War Crimes

Trump Board of Peace Launch

Former U.S. President Donald Trump unveiled a U.S.-led Board of Peace at the World Economic Forum in Davos, presenting it as a body to oversee Gaza's transition and to address broader global conflicts while naming himself chair.

The launch featured a signing ceremony with ministers and heads from about 19 countries on stage and invitations sent to dozens more, including leaders like Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and several Gulf monarchs.

The rollout also included claims that the board had backing from several Middle Eastern monarchs, Belarus's authoritarian leader described as 'Europe's last dictator', and at least one leader wanted for alleged war crimes, even as officials acknowledged uneven uptake and uncertainty about membership.

The White House charter and invitations give the board a broad mandate to promote stability, restore dependable and lawful governance, and secure enduring peace in conflict-affected areas, though critics note the draft charter often does not explicitly mention Gaza and many core details remain unpublished.

Reporting for this sectionCNNThe GuardianBBCTime Magazine

Draft board powers and funding

Reporting on the board's design says the draft charter concentrates exceptional powers in the chairman and ties membership to large voluntary contributions. Multiple outlets cite a leaked or circulated draft that would make Trump the inaugural chair with veto or approval authority over board decisions. The proposal reportedly allows the chair to appoint an executive board and sets three-year membership terms.

Those membership terms can be extended only at the chairman's discretion or through a reported billion-dollar permanent-seat mechanism. The financing model, including repeated reports that a one-time $1 billion contribution would secure a permanent seat after three years, and the chairman's reported ability to veto or approve decisions have been central to criticism of the design.

Reporting for this sectionLa SiciliaThe Straits TimesMiddle East EyeFortuneThe Business Times

Controversial invitees and reactions

The list of invitees and early signatories has been politically polarizing. Trump and U.S. officials reportedly invited a wide and controversial mix of states — Russia, China, Belarus, Gulf monarchies and others. They claimed to have attracted a handful of acceptances, including Hungary, Vietnam, Morocco and Argentina, even as major Western partners stayed away.

Some outlets highlighted Trump's public claim that he invited Vladimir Putin and said Putin had agreed, while Kremlin spokespeople said Moscow was only 'reviewing the invitation' and seeking clarification. The inclusion of authoritarian leaders and reportedly at least one leader wanted for alleged war crimes has been a major source of alarm among European and Ukrainian officials.

Reporting for this sectionCNNWashington ExaminerAAP NewsArise News

Reactions to draft board

European governments and many multilateral actors registered alarm, with France explicitly saying it would not join at this stage, Britain declining to sign, and other U.S. partners asking for clarifications. Diplomats and analysts warned that the body's broad remit, the chairman's reported powers and the $1 billion permanent-seat mechanism could undercut U.N. principles and existing Security Council authority.

Some described the draft as sidelining the U.N., even as the U.S. insisted the board could work with or operate alongside the United Nations. Responses ranged from outright refusal to cautious study and private concern about the political consequences of including Russia and other controversial actors.

Reporting for this sectionHaaretzThe Boston GlobeCNNThe Straits Times

Gaza reconstruction debate

Critics from rights groups, alternative outlets, and some regional commentators warned the board could sideline Palestinians, concentrate power, and resemble a pay-to-play or colonial-style oversight vehicle. Defenders frame the board as a pragmatic, action-oriented alternative to slow multilateral processes.

Outlets such as Countercurrents and GlobalPost say the plan excludes Palestinians from senior decision-making and liken it to colonial oversight, while other publications reported ambitious reconstruction visions. Coverage of Jared Kushner’s CGI proposals for luxury redevelopment and resort-style rebuilding was described by some as tone-deaf amid ongoing humanitarian crises, and the debate mixes questions of legality and legitimacy with starkly different visions for Gaza’s future.

Reporting for this sectionCountercurrents.orgglobalpostThe SunDefense Mirror